Suppr超能文献

硫糖铝与雷尼替丁预防机械通气患者上消化道出血的比较。加拿大重症监护试验组。

A comparison of sucralfate and ranitidine for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.

作者信息

Cook D, Guyatt G, Marshall J, Leasa D, Fuller H, Hall R, Peters S, Rutledge F, Griffith L, McLellan A, Wood G, Kirby A

机构信息

McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1998 Mar 19;338(12):791-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199803193381203.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients who require mechanical ventilation are at increased risk for gastrointestinal bleeding from stress ulcers. There are conflicting data on the effect of histamine H2-receptor antagonists and the cytoprotective agent sucralfate on rates of gastrointestinal bleeding, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and mortality.

METHODS

In a multicenter, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial, we compared sucralfate with the H2-receptor antagonist ranitidine for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in 1200 patients who required mechanical ventilation. Patients received either nasogastric sucralfate suspension (1 g every six hours) and an intravenous placebo or intravenous ranitidine (50 mg every eight hours) and a nasogastric placebo.

RESULTS

The patients in the two groups had similar base-line characteristics. Clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding developed in 10 of 596 (1.7 percent) of the patients receiving ranitidine, as compared with 23 of 604 (3.8 percent) of those receiving sucralfate (relative risk, 0.44; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.21 to 0.92; P=0.02). In the ranitidine group, 114 of 596 patients (19.1 percent) had ventilator-associated pneumonia, as compared with 98 of 604 (16.2 percent) in the sucralfate group (relative risk, 1.18; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.92 to 1.51; P=0.19). There was no significant difference between the groups in mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) (23.5 percent in the ranitidine group and 22.9 percent in the sucralfate group) or the duration of the stay in the ICU (median, nine days in both groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Among critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation, those receiving ranitidine had a significantly lower rate of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding than those treated with sucralfate. There were no significant differences in the rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia, the duration of the stay in the ICU, or mortality.

摘要

背景

需要机械通气的重症患者因应激性溃疡发生胃肠道出血的风险增加。关于组胺H2受体拮抗剂和细胞保护剂硫糖铝对胃肠道出血发生率、呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率及死亡率的影响,现有数据存在矛盾。

方法

在一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中,我们将硫糖铝与H2受体拮抗剂雷尼替丁进行比较,以预防1200例需要机械通气的患者发生上消化道出血。患者接受鼻饲硫糖铝混悬液(每6小时1g)和静脉安慰剂,或静脉注射雷尼替丁(每8小时50mg)和鼻饲安慰剂。

结果

两组患者的基线特征相似。接受雷尼替丁治疗的596例患者中有10例(1.7%)发生了具有临床意义的胃肠道出血,而接受硫糖铝治疗的604例患者中有23例(3.8%)发生了此类出血(相对风险,0.44;95%置信区间,0.21至0.92;P = 0.02)。雷尼替丁组的596例患者中有114例(19.1%)发生了呼吸机相关性肺炎,而硫糖铝组的604例患者中有98例(16.2%)发生了此类肺炎(相对风险,1.18;95%置信区间,0.92至1.51;P = 0.19)。两组在重症监护病房(ICU)的死亡率(雷尼替丁组为23.5%,硫糖铝组为22.9%)或在ICU的住院时间(两组中位数均为9天)方面无显著差异。

结论

在需要机械通气的重症患者中,接受雷尼替丁治疗的患者发生具有临床意义的胃肠道出血的发生率显著低于接受硫糖铝治疗的患者。在呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率、ICU住院时间或死亡率方面无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验