O'Kroy J A, Coast J R
Respiratory Physiology Unit, Texas A & M University, College Station.
Respiration. 1993;60(5):279-83. doi: 10.1159/000196216.
This study was conducted to ascertain whether resistive or flow type training would better improve both strength and endurance in the respiratory muscles of healthy subjects. Subjects performed a battery of respiratory strength and endurance tests before and after training, which consisted of either control, cycling exercise (E), inspiratory loading (IL), expiratory loading (EL), or hyperventilation (H) training for 4 weeks. Maximal sustained ventilation increased after training in the E and H groups. Both IL and H improved inspiratory fatigue resistance. IL improved maximal inspiratory pressure. No significant changes were found in maximal expiratory pressure although E, EL, and H tended to improve. There was no statistical difference in maximal voluntary ventilation between groups after training, but the H group alone did increase. This study suggests that respiratory muscle strength and endurance can be improved with flow or resistive training. Flow type training improves both flow and resistive tests while resistive training appears to affect only strength and resistive type measurements.
本研究旨在确定阻力型或流量型训练是否能更好地改善健康受试者呼吸肌的力量和耐力。受试者在训练前后进行了一系列呼吸力量和耐力测试,训练为期4周,包括对照组、骑行运动(E)、吸气负荷(IL)、呼气负荷(EL)或过度通气(H)训练。E组和H组训练后最大持续通气量增加。IL和H均提高了吸气疲劳耐受性。IL提高了最大吸气压力。尽管E组、EL组和H组有改善趋势,但最大呼气压力未发现显著变化。训练后各组间最大自主通气量无统计学差异,但仅H组增加。本研究表明,流量或阻力训练可改善呼吸肌力量和耐力。流量型训练可改善流量和阻力测试,而阻力训练似乎仅影响力量和阻力型测量。