Goodson A R, LaMaster T S, Gutterman D D
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.
Am J Physiol. 1993 Dec;265(6 Pt 2):R1311-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1993.265.6.R1311.
We have previously identified discrete brain sites [anterior (AHA) and lateral hypothalamus, periaqueductal gray, pontine parabrachial nucleus, lateral reticular formation, and rostral ventrolateral medulla (RVLM)] in the cat, in which electrical or chemical activation produces coronary vasoconstriction. This study examines whether the most rostral (AHA) and caudal (RVLM) of these sites are connected as part of a common pathway mediating coronary vasoconstriction. In chloralose-anesthetized cats, electrical stimulation in the AHA produced maximum increases in arterial pressure (41 +/- 10%) and coronary vascular resistance (28 +/- 9%). Microinjection of lidocaine into the RVLM attenuated the increases in arterial pressure (10 +/- 3%) and coronary vascular resistance (5 +/- 1%) in response to electrical stimulation in the AHA (P < 0.05 vs. before lidocaine). Lidocaine nonspecifically inhibits neural elements in the region. gamma-Aminobutyric acid in the RVLM, which selectively inhibits cell bodies and not fibers passing through the RVLM, attenuated the increase in coronary vascular resistance (38 +/- 8 to 14 +/- 3%; P < 0.05) but not the increase in arterial pressure (87 +/- 12 to 92 +/- 16%) in response to electrical stimulation in the AHA. These data indicate that coronary vasoconstriction in response to electrical stimulation in the AHA requires cell bodies in the RVLM; however, the associated pressor response is mediated by fibers passing through the RVLM. We conclude that a polysynaptic descending pathway that mediates sympathetic coronary vasoconstriction descends from the AHA through a synaptic connection in the RVLM.
我们之前已在猫身上确定了离散的脑区[下丘脑前部(AHA)和外侧区、导水管周围灰质、脑桥臂旁核、外侧网状结构以及延髓头端腹外侧区(RVLM)],其中电刺激或化学刺激会导致冠状动脉收缩。本研究旨在探讨这些脑区中最靠前的(AHA)和最靠后的(RVLM)区域是否作为介导冠状动脉收缩的共同通路的一部分相互连接。在氯醛糖麻醉的猫中,AHA区域的电刺激使动脉血压(41±10%)和冠状动脉血管阻力(28±9%)达到最大增幅。向RVLM区域微量注射利多卡因可减弱AHA区域电刺激引起的动脉血压增幅(10±3%)和冠状动脉血管阻力增幅(5±1%)(与注射利多卡因前相比,P<0.05)。利多卡因可非特异性抑制该区域的神经元。RVLM区域的γ-氨基丁酸可选择性抑制细胞体而非穿过RVLM的纤维,它减弱了AHA区域电刺激引起的冠状动脉血管阻力增幅(从38±8%降至14±3%;P<0.05),但未减弱动脉血压增幅(从87±12%降至92±16%)。这些数据表明,AHA区域电刺激引起的冠状动脉收缩需要RVLM区域的细胞体参与;然而,相关的升压反应是由穿过RVLM的纤维介导的。我们得出结论,介导交感神经冠状动脉收缩的多突触下行通路从AHA通过RVLM中的突触连接下行。