Suppr超能文献

辐射防护标准的历史、现状及趋势。

History, current status, and trends of radiation protection standards.

作者信息

Hendee W R

机构信息

Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226.

出版信息

Med Phys. 1993 Sep-Oct;20(5):1303-14. doi: 10.1118/1.597153.

Abstract

Quantitative standards for protection against exposure to ionizing radiation were first formulated in the 1930s. Since that time, standards have been restated periodically in different radiation units and conceptual frameworks that reflect improved understanding of the biological effects of radiation interactions and their consequences for human health. In the 1970s the expression of protection standards shifted from a dose- to a risk-based approach, with dose limits established to yield risks to radiation workers comparable with those for workers in other "safe" industries. Over the years, radiation protection standards have exhibited a downward trend to more rigorous limits that require increased commitments of personnel and resources for their enforcement. There are several reasons for this trend, including increased recognition of the long-term health effects of radiation, improved protection measures that permit radiation use at lower levels of exposure, growing numbers of persons exposed occupationally to radiation, and probably a greater intolerance to involuntary risks in society, with radiation targeted as a highly visible source of involuntary risks in the form of nuclear power plants and radioactive waste sites. In the past few years, reports of the Radiation Effects Research Foundation, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, and the National Research Council of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences have presented increased risk estimates for radiation exposure as a consequence of ongoing epidemiological analyses of human populations exposed to ionizing radiation. These risk estimates have enhanced public concern about radiation exposure and set the stage for discussions about the desirability of further reductions in exposure standards for radiation workers and members of the public. Such reductions would directly affect the professional activities, educational responsibilities, and administrative burdens of most medical and health physicists. These persons should understand the process of deriving risk estimates from epidemiological data, the factors that influence the risk estimates, how risk estimates are integrated into radiation protection standards, and the possible impact of more rigorous standards on the use of radiation in medicine.

摘要

20世纪30年代首次制定了针对电离辐射暴露的防护定量标准。自那时起,标准便以不同的辐射单位和概念框架定期重新表述,这些单位和框架反映了对辐射相互作用的生物学效应及其对人类健康影响的理解不断加深。20世纪70年代,防护标准的表述从基于剂量的方法转向基于风险的方法,设定剂量限值是为了使辐射工作人员面临的风险与其他“安全”行业的工作人员相当。多年来,辐射防护标准呈现出一种下降趋势,即限值变得更加严格,这需要在执行标准时投入更多的人力和资源。这种趋势有几个原因,包括对辐射长期健康影响的认识增加、改进的防护措施使得能够在较低暴露水平下使用辐射、职业性接触辐射的人数不断增加,以及社会可能对非自愿风险的容忍度降低,辐射被视为以核电站和放射性废物处理场等形式存在的高度明显的非自愿风险来源。在过去几年中,辐射效应研究基金会、联合国原子辐射影响科学委员会以及美国国家科学院国家研究委员会的报告,由于对受电离辐射照射的人群进行持续的流行病学分析,给出了更高的辐射暴露风险估计。这些风险估计加剧了公众对辐射暴露的担忧,并为讨论是否进一步降低辐射工作人员和公众的暴露标准奠定了基础。这种降低将直接影响大多数医学和健康物理学家的专业活动、教育职责以及管理负担。这些人员应该了解从流行病学数据得出风险估计的过程、影响风险估计的因素、风险估计如何纳入辐射防护标准,以及更严格的标准对医学中辐射使用可能产生的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验