Suppr超能文献

评估丙酸氟替卡松(每日500微克)通过碟式吸入器或压力定量吸入器以干粉形式给药,并与丙酸倍氯米松(每日1000微克)通过压力定量吸入器给药进行比较。

Evaluation of fluticasone propionate (500 micrograms day-1) administered either as dry powder via a Diskhaler inhaler or pressurized inhaler and compared with beclomethasone dipropionate (1000 micrograms day-1) administered by pressurized inhaler.

作者信息

Lundback B, Alexander M, Day J, Hebert J, Holzer R, Van Uffelen R, Kesten S, Jones A L

机构信息

Lungkliniken, Central Hospital, Boden, Sweden.

出版信息

Respir Med. 1993 Nov;87(8):609-20. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(05)80264-1.

Abstract

Five hundred and eighty-five patients with moderate asthma, currently receiving 400-1000 micrograms day-1 of an inhaled corticosteroid, were treated for 6 weeks in a double-blind, randomized, parallel group study with either 500 micrograms day-1 fluticasone propionate as a dry powder via a Diskhaler inhaler, 500 micrograms day-1 fluticasone propionate via a pressurized inhaler or 1000 micrograms day-1 beclomethasone dipropionate via a pressurized inhaler. For all three treatment groups, mean morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs) increased within 1 week of the start of treatment. There were also improvements in clinic lung function, daytime and night-time asthma symptoms and a reduction in daytime and night-time rescue bronchodilator medication in all three groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the two formulations of fluticasone propionate in any of the efficacy parameters. Fluticasone propionate via the Diskhaler was significantly more effective than beclomethasone dipropionate over the 6 week study period in reducing diurnal variation (mean difference--4 l min-1, 95% CI--8 to 0 l min-1: P = 0.03). Fluticasone propionate via the Diskhaler produced a statistically significant improvement in night-time symptoms when compared to beclomethasone dipropionate whereas, beclomethasone dipropionate 1000 micrograms day-1 was statistically significantly more effective than both formulations of fluticasone propionate in improving daytime symptoms (P < 0.05). However, these statistical differences must be viewed together with the fact that very few patients recorded a score of 2 or more for both daytime or night-time symptoms. There was a similarly low incidence of adverse events with all three treatments with no evidence of hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA)-axis suppression. The results of the 6-week comparative study showed that 500 micrograms day-1 fluticasone propionate whether administered via pressurized inhaler or Diskhaler is as effective and as safe as 1000 micrograms day-1 beclomethasone dipropionate administered via a pressurized inhaler in the treatment of moderate asthma. Over 12 months fluticasone propionate 500 micrograms day-1 via a pressurized inhaler was at least as effective and as well tolerated as beclomethasone dipropionate 1000 micrograms day-1.

摘要

585例中度哮喘患者,目前正在接受每日400 - 1000微克吸入性糖皮质激素治疗,在一项双盲、随机、平行组研究中接受了6周治疗,分别为:通过Diskhaler吸入器每日吸入500微克丙酸氟替卡松干粉;通过压力定量吸入器每日吸入500微克丙酸氟替卡松;或通过压力定量吸入器每日吸入1000微克二丙酸倍氯米松。在所有三个治疗组中,治疗开始后1周内,平均早晚呼气峰值流速(PEFR)均有所增加。三个组的临床肺功能、白天和夜间哮喘症状也有所改善,白天和夜间缓解支气管扩张剂的使用量减少。两种丙酸氟替卡松制剂在任何疗效参数上均无统计学显著差异。在为期6周的研究期间,通过Diskhaler吸入的丙酸氟替卡松在减少昼夜变化方面比二丙酸倍氯米松显著更有效(平均差值 - 4升/分钟,95%置信区间 - 8至0升/分钟:P = 0.03)。与二丙酸倍氯米松相比,通过Diskhaler吸入的丙酸氟替卡松在夜间症状方面有统计学显著改善,而每日1000微克二丙酸倍氯米松在改善白天症状方面比两种丙酸氟替卡松制剂在统计学上显著更有效(P < 0.05)。然而,这些统计学差异必须结合以下事实来看:很少有患者白天或夜间症状的评分达到2分或更高。所有三种治疗的不良事件发生率同样较低,没有下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾上腺(HPA)轴抑制的证据。为期6周的比较研究结果表明,每日500微克丙酸氟替卡松,无论通过压力定量吸入器还是Diskhaler吸入,在治疗中度哮喘方面与通过压力定量吸入器每日吸入1000微克二丙酸倍氯米松一样有效且安全。在12个月的时间里,通过压力定量吸入器每日500微克丙酸氟替卡松至少与每日1000微克二丙酸倍氯米松一样有效且耐受性良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验