Agertoft L, Pedersen S
Department of Pediatrics, Kolding Hospital, Denmark.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Jun;99(6 Pt 1):773-80. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)80011-5.
New inhaled glucocorticosteroids and inhalers are being developed. Their clinical equipotency is difficult to assess and is often discussed.
This study was carried out to compare the effect of budesonide Turbuhaler and fluticasone propionate (FP) Diskhaler in a dose reduction study in children (ages 5 to 16 years) with asthma.
Children treated with budesonide administered through a pressurized metered-dose inhaler with a large volume spacer had their budesonide dose gradually reduced to define the minimal effective dose with this delivery system. After this period, 217 children were randomly allocated to treatment with half the dose of either budesonide Turbukaler or FP Diskhaler for 5 weeks in a double-blind trial. If no deterioration in asthma control was seen, the dose was further reduced by 50% at 5-week intervals until deterioration in asthma control was seen. Throughout the study, morning and evening peak expiratory flow, symptoms, and use of rescue beta 2-agonist were recorded in diaries. Lung function tests and a standardized exercise test were performed at the clinic at the end of each treatment period. Urine cortisol excretion (24 hours) was measured before and after the first 5-week treatment period. Standardized criteria for deterioration in asthma control, based on diary card variables and exercise testing, were used to determine the minimal effective dose for each patient; and from this, the number of dose reduction steps was calculated.
No statistically significant difference was seen in number of dose reduction steps from baseline or in minimal effective dose between the two treatments; mean reduction was 1.59 dose steps for budesonide Turbuhaler and 1.65 dose steps for FP Diskhaler (p = 0.52), and minimal effective dose was 188 micrograms for budesonide Turbuhaler and 180 micrograms for FP Diskhaler. After these dose reductions, the same level of asthma control was observed in the budesonide Turbuhaler and FP Diskhaler groups. Furthermore, no statistically significant differences between the two inhaler-drug combinations were seen in daytime or nighttime symptoms, morning and evening peak expiratory flow, use of rescue beta 2-agonist, lung functions at the clinic, exercise-induced fall in lung function, or 24-hour urinary cortisol excretion during the first 5-week period.
Microgram for microgram, budesonide Turbuhaler and FP Diskhaler are equally effective in treatment of children with moderate asthma.
新型吸入性糖皮质激素和吸入器正在研发中。它们的临床等效性难以评估,且常被讨论。
本研究旨在比较布地奈德都保和丙酸氟替卡松(FP)准纳器在5至16岁哮喘儿童剂量减量研究中的效果。
通过带有大容量储雾罐的压力定量吸入器使用布地奈德治疗的儿童,其布地奈德剂量逐渐减少,以确定该给药系统的最小有效剂量。在此阶段后,217名儿童在双盲试验中被随机分配接受布地奈德都保或FP准纳器半量剂量治疗5周。如果哮喘控制未恶化,则每隔5周将剂量进一步减少50%,直至哮喘控制出现恶化。在整个研究过程中,通过日记记录早晚呼气峰值流速、症状以及急救β2激动剂的使用情况。在每个治疗期结束时,在诊所进行肺功能测试和标准化运动测试。在第一个5周治疗期前后测量24小时尿皮质醇排泄量。基于日记卡变量和运动测试的哮喘控制恶化标准化标准,用于确定每位患者的最小有效剂量;据此计算剂量减少步骤的数量。
两种治疗方法从基线开始的剂量减少步骤数量或最小有效剂量均无统计学显著差异;布地奈德都保的平均减少量为1.59个剂量步骤,FP准纳器为1.65个剂量步骤(p = 0.52),布地奈德都保的最小有效剂量为188微克,FP准纳器为180微克。在这些剂量减少后,布地奈德都保组和FP准纳器组观察到相同水平的哮喘控制。此外,在第一个5周期间,两种吸入器 - 药物组合在白天或夜间症状、早晚呼气峰值流速、急救β激动剂的使用、诊所的肺功能、运动诱发的肺功能下降或24小时尿皮质醇排泄方面均无统计学显著差异。
微克对微克,布地奈德都保和FP准纳器在治疗中度哮喘儿童方面同样有效。