McClain D S, Fuller A O
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor 48109-0620.
Virology. 1994 Feb;198(2):690-702. doi: 10.1006/viro.1994.1081.
We previously provided evidence for a model of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) entry by a cascade of interactions between components of the virion envelope and cellular plasma membrane (Fuller and Lee, 1992, J. Virol. 66, 5002-5012). In this report we have determined entry kinetics of wild-type HSV-1 into two highly susceptible cell lines to further explore the contributions of viral or cellular factors to entry. Penetration rates of preattached virus varied among several common laboratory HSV-1 strains into one cell line. However, entry kinetics varied substantially for a single strain into highly susceptible HEp-2 or Vero cells under identical conditions. Plaquing efficiencies and sensitivity to heparin also significantly differed between these cells. Kinetics of entry that included virus attachment and penetration showed that the cell-specific effects can be explained by two distinct phases of attachment that occurred before penetration, but differed in duration on both susceptible cell lines. Initial attachment of virus is resistant to removal with phosphate-buffered saline, but sensitive to removal with buffer containing heparin. This is followed by a second type of attachment that is heparin resistant, but still sensitive to extracellular inactivation. We conclude that although undefined factors unique to individual wild-type HSV-1 laboratory strains affect entry kinetics, entry of any one strain is greatly influenced by interactions of virus with specific cell components during at least two distinct phases of attachment before penetration. Moreover, the second phase to stabilize binding seems to be the rate-limiting event in entry. Since major differences in the amounts or sulfation patterns of heparan sulfate were not detected, differences in the surfaces of HEp-2 and Vero cells that influence the kinetics and efficiency of HSV-1 entry are likely in the fine structure of heparan sulfate or in the presence and quantity of other unidentified receptors.
我们之前通过单纯疱疹病毒1型(HSV-1)病毒体包膜成分与细胞质膜之间的一系列相互作用,为HSV-1的进入模型提供了证据(Fuller和Lee,1992年,《病毒学杂志》66卷,5002 - 5012页)。在本报告中,我们确定了野生型HSV-1进入两种高度易感细胞系的进入动力学,以进一步探索病毒或细胞因子对进入的贡献。在一种细胞系中,几种常见实验室HSV-1菌株的预附着病毒的穿透率有所不同。然而,在相同条件下,单一菌株进入高度易感的HEp-2或Vero细胞时,进入动力学有很大差异。这些细胞之间的空斑形成效率和对肝素的敏感性也有显著差异。包括病毒附着和穿透的进入动力学表明,细胞特异性效应可以通过穿透前发生的两个不同附着阶段来解释,但在两种易感细胞系上的持续时间不同。病毒的初始附着对用磷酸盐缓冲盐水去除有抗性,但对用含肝素的缓冲液去除敏感。随后是第二种类型的附着,它对肝素具有抗性,但仍对细胞外失活敏感。我们得出结论,尽管单个野生型HSV-1实验室菌株特有的未定义因素会影响进入动力学,但任何一种菌株的进入在穿透前至少两个不同附着阶段中,会受到病毒与特定细胞成分相互作用的极大影响。此外,稳定结合的第二阶段似乎是进入过程中的限速事件。由于未检测到硫酸乙酰肝素在数量或硫酸化模式上的主要差异,影响HSV-1进入动力学和效率的HEp-2和Vero细胞表面差异可能存在于硫酸乙酰肝素的精细结构中,或存在于其他未鉴定受体的存在和数量中。