Chang T C, Robson S C, Spencer J A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College London Medical School, UK.
Early Hum Dev. 1993 Nov 1;35(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(93)90137-j.
Measurements of triceps and subscapular skinfold thickness, mid-arm circumference (MAC), head circumference (HC) and crown-heel length were performed by two observers in 30 healthy neonates. Intra-observer standard deviation for all measurements, calculated using one-way analysis of variance, was small and similar for each observer. Inter-observer variability was assessed using limits of agreement. There were small, systematic, differences between observers for measurements of triceps skinfold thickness and crown-heel length, and for calculated ponderal index (PI). When related to respective published reference ranges, the 95% prediction intervals for subscapular (-0.51, 0.68 mm) and triceps (-0.65, 0.29 mm) skinfold thicknesses were less than those for the MAC/HC ratio (-2.1, 1.9) and PI (-0.23, 0.28). The results indicate that skinfold thickness measurements are a more robust measure and, therefore, may be of greater value in the assessment of neonates with suspected fetal growth retardation.
两名观察者对30名健康新生儿进行了肱三头肌和肩胛下皮褶厚度、上臂中部周长(MAC)、头围(HC)和顶臀长度的测量。使用单向方差分析计算的所有测量的观察者内标准差很小,且每位观察者的标准差相似。使用一致性界限评估观察者间的变异性。观察者之间在肱三头肌皮褶厚度和顶臀长度测量以及计算的 ponderal 指数(PI)方面存在微小的系统性差异。当与各自公布的参考范围相关时,肩胛下(-0.51, 0.68 mm)和肱三头肌(-0.65, 0.29 mm)皮褶厚度的95%预测区间小于MAC/HC比值(-2.1, 1.9)和PI(-0.23, 0.28)的预测区间。结果表明,皮褶厚度测量是一种更可靠的测量方法,因此,在评估疑似胎儿生长受限的新生儿时可能具有更大的价值。