Takayama K, Mitchell D H, Din Z Z, Mukerjee P, Li C, Coleman D L
Department of Bacteriology, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.
J Biol Chem. 1994 Jan 21;269(3):2241-4.
Using the equilibrium dialysis apparatus, an aqueous suspension of predominantly aggregated Re lipopolysaccharide (ReLPS) from Escherichia coli D31 m4 (99.9% at 82.5 microM) can be processed to yield a solution of monomeric ReLPS at a saturation concentration of 77 ng/ml (3.4 x 10(-8) M). We compared the in vitro biological activities of these two physically distinct types of ReLPS preparations in two select assays, reaction in the Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay and induction of Egr-1 mRNA in macrophages. These assays were chosen for their rapid response times and relatively short incubation periods. The monomeric ReLPS was 179- and 1000-fold more active than the aggregated ReLPS preparation in the LAL assay and induction of Egr-1 mRNA by thioglycollate-elicited murine peritoneal macrophages, respectively. These results clearly showed that the monomeric ReLPS is the more active form. The lower biological activities of the aggregated ReLPS preparation might be due to the presence of a small amount of monomeric ReLPS (0.01-0.6%) produced during its preparation and the incubation periods in the biological assays. Thus, aggregated ReLPS may be relatively inactive.
使用平衡透析装置,可以对来自大肠杆菌D31 m4的主要为聚集态的Re脂多糖(ReLPS)水悬浮液(82.5微摩尔时占99.9%)进行处理,以得到饱和浓度为77纳克/毫升(3.4×10⁻⁸摩尔)的单体ReLPS溶液。我们在两种选定的检测中比较了这两种物理性质不同的ReLPS制剂的体外生物活性,即鲎试剂(LAL)检测中的反应以及巨噬细胞中Egr-1 mRNA的诱导。选择这些检测是因为它们反应迅速且孵育期相对较短。在LAL检测以及由巯基乙酸诱导的小鼠腹腔巨噬细胞诱导Egr-1 mRNA方面,单体ReLPS的活性分别比聚集态ReLPS制剂高179倍和1000倍。这些结果清楚地表明单体ReLPS是活性更高的形式。聚集态ReLPS制剂较低的生物活性可能是由于其制备过程中产生的少量单体ReLPS(0.01 - 0.6%)以及生物检测中的孵育期。因此,聚集态ReLPS可能相对无活性。