• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重创伤后的功能受限:使用幸福感量表进行更敏感的评估——创伤恢复试点项目

Functional limitation after major trauma: a more sensitive assessment using the Quality of Well-being scale--the trauma recovery pilot project.

作者信息

Holbrook T L, Hoyt D B, Anderson J P, Hollingsworth-Fridlund P, Shackford S R

机构信息

Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1994 Jan;36(1):74-8.

PMID:8295253
Abstract

Little is known about the degree of disability and quality of life of patients after major trauma. We conducted a prospective study to examine the incidence and predictors of functional limitation (FL). Between January 1, 1990 and March 30, 1990, 61 eligible trauma patients were enrolled in the study (admission GCS score > or = 12, LOS > 24 hours). Functional limitation after trauma was measured at discharge and 3 months after discharge using the Quality of Well-being (QWB) scale, a more sensitive index to the well end of the functioning continuum (range, 0 = death to 1.000 = optimum functioning). Functional limitation was also measured using a standard ADL scale (range, 17 = full function to 41 = maximum dysfunction). Risk factors measured were injury severity, body region, depression (CES-D) scale, and social support. Follow-up was achieved in 42 patients (70%). The mean age was 30 years, 74% were male, 52% white, 41% hispanic, and 3% other. The mean ISS was 15, with 69% blunt injuries and a mean LOS of 12 days. The QWB scores improved between discharge and follow-up; discharge mean = 0.457 (+/- 0.048), follow-up mean = 0.613 (+/- 0.118), but the mean QWB score at follow-up still reflected a significant degree of functional limitation. The mean percentage of change in QWB scores was 34.5% (+/- 25.5%) with a range of -6.34% to 103.8%. The discharge mean FDS was 29 (+/- 6.2) while the follow-up FDS mean was 17 (+/- 3.8), reflecting that most patients at follow-up reported near-perfect ADL functioning.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

对于严重创伤后患者的残疾程度和生活质量,人们了解甚少。我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,以检查功能受限(FL)的发生率和预测因素。在1990年1月1日至1990年3月30日期间,61名符合条件的创伤患者被纳入研究(入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分≥12分,住院时间>24小时)。创伤后的功能受限在出院时和出院后3个月使用幸福质量(QWB)量表进行测量,该量表对功能连续体的良好结局更为敏感(范围为0 =死亡至1.000 =最佳功能)。功能受限也使用标准日常生活活动(ADL)量表进行测量(范围为17 =完全功能至41 =最大功能障碍)。测量的危险因素包括损伤严重程度、身体部位、抑郁(CES-D)量表和社会支持。42名患者(70%)完成了随访。平均年龄为30岁,74%为男性,52%为白人,41%为西班牙裔,3%为其他种族。平均损伤严重度评分(ISS)为15分,69%为钝性损伤,平均住院时间为12天。QWB评分在出院和随访之间有所改善;出院时平均分为0.457(±0.048),随访时平均分为0.613(±0.118),但随访时的平均QWB评分仍反映出显著程度的功能受限。QWB评分的平均变化百分比为34.5%(±25.5%),范围为-6.34%至103.8%。出院时平均FDS为29(±6.2),而随访时FDS平均分为17(±3.8),这表明大多数随访患者报告日常生活活动功能接近完美。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
Functional limitation after major trauma: a more sensitive assessment using the Quality of Well-being scale--the trauma recovery pilot project.严重创伤后的功能受限:使用幸福感量表进行更敏感的评估——创伤恢复试点项目
J Trauma. 1994 Jan;36(1):74-8.
2
The impact of major trauma: quality-of-life outcomes are worse in women than in men, independent of mechanism and injury severity.重大创伤的影响:无论创伤机制和严重程度如何,女性的生活质量结果均比男性更差。
J Trauma. 2004 Feb;56(2):284-90. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000109758.75406.F8.
3
Outcome after major trauma: discharge and 6-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project.重大创伤后的结局:创伤恢复项目的出院及6个月随访结果
J Trauma. 1998 Aug;45(2):315-23; discussion 323-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199808000-00018.
4
Trauma in adolescents causes long-term marked deficits in quality of life: adolescent children do not recover preinjury quality of life or function up to two years postinjury compared to national norms.青少年创伤会导致长期显著的生活质量缺陷:与全国标准相比,受伤青少年在受伤后长达两年的时间里无法恢复到受伤前的生活质量或功能水平。
J Trauma. 2007 Mar;62(3):577-83; discussion 583. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318031aa97.
5
Outcome after major trauma: 12-month and 18-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project.严重创伤后的结局:创伤恢复项目的12个月和18个月随访结果
J Trauma. 1999 May;46(5):765-71; discussion 771-3. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199905000-00003.
6
Memories and health-related quality of life after intensive care: a follow-up study.重症监护后记忆和健康相关生活质量:一项随访研究。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):38-44. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b42909.
7
A fate worse than death? Long-term outcome of trauma patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit.比死亡更糟糕的命运?入住外科重症监护病房的创伤患者的长期结局。
J Trauma. 2009 Aug;67(2):341-8; discussion 348-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a5cc34.
8
Functional recovery at a minimum of 2 years after multiple injury-development of an outcome score.多发伤后至少2年的功能恢复——一种结局评分的制定
J Trauma. 2008 Oct;65(4):799-808; discussion 808. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181820dae.
9
Assessment of quality of life and functional outcome in patients sustaining moderate and major trauma: a multicentre, prospective cohort study.中度和重度创伤患者生活质量与功能转归的评估:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究
Injury. 2014 May;45(5):902-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.11.006. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
10
Prevalence and prognostic factors of disability after childhood injury.儿童期受伤后残疾的患病率及预后因素。
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):e810-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1035.

引用本文的文献

1
Parameters influencing health-related quality of life after severe trauma: a systematic review (part II).影响严重创伤后健康相关生活质量的参数:系统评价(第二部分)。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Feb;50(1):93-106. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02276-y. Epub 2023 May 15.
2
Health-related quality of life after severe trauma and available PROMS: an updated review (part I).严重创伤后的健康相关生活质量和可用的 PROMS:最新综述(第一部分)。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Apr;49(2):747-761. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02178-5. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
3
Participant retention in trauma intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up studies: a post-hoc analysis of a previous scoping review.
创伤重症监护病房(ICU)随访研究中的参与者保留情况:一项对先前范围综述的事后分析
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020 Nov 4;5(1):e000584. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000584. eCollection 2020.
4
Return to work following injury: the role of economic, social, and job-related factors.受伤后重返工作岗位:经济、社会及与工作相关因素的作用。
Am J Public Health. 1998 Nov;88(11):1630-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.11.1630.