Korkmaz M E, Mahmarian J J, Guidry G W, Verani M S
Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030.
Am J Cardiol. 1994 Jan 15;73(2):200-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90215-1.
The diagnostic accuracy, safety and tolerance of adenosine thallium scintigraphy have been reported using a 2-site intravenous infusion with either a titrated or fixed-dose protocol. A single-site infusion would considerably simplify the test procedure, but its safety must be established before it can be recommended. Accordingly, 400 consecutive patients who had adenosine and thallium-201 administered through the same intravenous line were classified into 2 groups. Group I (n = 201) patients received a 7-minute titrated intravenous infusion of adenosine, with an initial dose of 50 micrograms/kg/min that increased at 1-minute intervals to a maximum of 140 micrograms/kg/min. Group II (n = 199) patients received a fixed dose of adenosine at 140 micrograms/kg/min for 6 minutes. Adenosine significantly (p < 0.001) increased heart rate and decreased systolic blood pressure by similar amounts in both groups. Adverse effects occurred more often (88 vs 71%, p < 0.001) and started earlier (2.8 vs 3.6 minutes, p < 0.001) in group II. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of second- and third-degree atrioventricular block between the 2 groups (4.0 vs 5.0%); however, chest pain, flushing and nausea were all more frequent in group II. Severe side effects were seldom seen in either group and occurred in 9 group I and 8 group II patients. Scintigraphic findings were similar in both groups. Transient perfusion defects were seen more often in patients with than without second- or third-degree atrioventricular block (42 vs 21%, p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
腺苷铊闪烁扫描术的诊断准确性、安全性及耐受性已通过双部位静脉输注并采用滴定或固定剂量方案进行了报道。单部位输注会显著简化测试程序,但在推荐使用之前必须确定其安全性。因此,将400例通过同一静脉通路给予腺苷和铊-201的连续患者分为两组。第一组(n = 201)患者接受7分钟的腺苷滴定静脉输注,初始剂量为50微克/千克/分钟,每隔1分钟增加剂量,最大剂量为140微克/千克/分钟。第二组(n = 199)患者接受140微克/千克/分钟的腺苷固定剂量输注6分钟。腺苷在两组中均显著(p < 0.001)提高心率并降低收缩压,且降低幅度相似。第二组的不良反应发生率更高(88% 对71%,p < 0.001)且出现更早(2.8分钟对3.6分钟,p < 0.001)。两组之间二度和三度房室传导阻滞的发生率无显著差异(4.0% 对5.0%);然而,第二组中胸痛、脸红和恶心更为常见。两组中严重副作用均很少见,第一组有9例,第二组有8例。两组的闪烁扫描结果相似。二度或三度房室传导阻滞患者比无此情况的患者更常出现短暂灌注缺损(42% 对21%,p < 0.05)。(摘要截选至250词)