Tan S L, Doyle P, Maconochie N, Edwards R G, Balen A, Bekir J, Brinsden P, Campbell S
Hallam Medical Centre, London Women's Clinic, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jan;170(1 Pt 1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70380-9.
Our aim was to compare the cumulative conception and live-birth rates after in vitro fertilization in women undergoing their first course of in vitro fertilization treatment with those in women undergoing their second course of treatment, having previously achieved an in vitro fertilization pregnancy. This study occurred in a tertiary referral-assisted conception unit.
The cumulative conception rates obtained by life-table analysis in 4115 women having their first course of in vitro fertilization therapy (7327 treatment cycles leading to 1123 pregnancies) were compared by means of the log-rank test with those of 331 women in their second course of treatment, having previously achieved an in vitro fertilization pregnancy (561 treatment cycles leading to 138 second in vitro fertilization pregnancies). Similarly, the cumulative live birth rates of 3824 women in their first course of treatment (7136 treatment cycles leading to 732 live births) were compared with those of 105 women in their second course of treatment, having previously achieved an in vitro fertilization live birth (205 treatment cycles leading to 33 second in vitro fertilization live births).
The cumulative conception rates and cumulative live birth rates were significantly higher in women having their second course of in vitro fertilization treatment than in those having their first course (cumulative conception rate: p = 0.0001; cumulative live birth rate, p = 0.007). After five cycles of in vitro fertilization, the cumulative conception rates and cumulative live birth rates were 49.8% (95% confidence interval, 46.3% to 53.5%) and 39.0% (95% confidence interval, 35.4% to 42.9%), respectively, in those having their first course of treatment compared with 69.9% (95% confidence interval, 57.6% to 81.3%) and 68.6% (95% confidence interval, 46.1% to 88.5%), respectively, in those having their second course. The estimated median numbers of cycles taken to achieve a pregnancy and live birth (assuming all women could potentially undergo the same number of cycles) were six and eight, respectively, in the first course of treatment compared with only three and five in the second course.
Women who have achieved a previous in vitro fertilization pregnancy have significantly higher cumulative conception rate and cumulative live birth rates compared with those of women having their first course of treatment.
