Suppr超能文献

奥 Horn 和 Dölle 的闪光试验程序在视神经炎诊断中的比较。

Comparison between the flicker test procedures of Aulhorn and of Dölle in the diagnosis of optic neuritis.

作者信息

Stellberger C, Wetzel W, Duncker G

机构信息

Universitäts-Augenklinik, Kiel, Germany.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1993 Dec;231(12):692-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00919283.

Abstract

The use of the flicker test for diagnostic purposes is based on the absence of Brücke's effect during acute inflammation of the optic nerve. The test device of Aulhorn was compared with another, less expensive flicker test device, that of Dölle. The flicker test device of Aulhorn uses a mechanical projection system. In the device of Dölle, the flicker field is formed by electronically controlled groups of light-emitting diodes. In an initial examination, the reliability of Aulhorn's test was slightly higher than of Dölle's procedure. The normal ranges in 45 healthy subjects differed markedly between the two methods. One hundred and fifteen eyes of patients with established or suspected optic neuritis were also examined. Although there were differences in some conditions (e.g. shape and homogeneity of flicker field) due to the techniques, the specificity and sensitivity of the two methods were similar concerning the diagnosis of acute optic neuritis.

摘要

将闪烁试验用于诊断目的是基于视神经急性炎症期间不存在布吕克效应。将奥尔霍恩的测试设备与另一种更便宜的闪烁测试设备——多勒的设备进行了比较。奥尔霍恩的闪烁测试设备使用机械投影系统。在多勒的设备中,闪烁场由电子控制的发光二极管组形成。在初步检查中,奥尔霍恩测试的可靠性略高于多勒的方法。45名健康受试者的正常范围在两种方法之间有显著差异。还对115只已确诊或疑似视神经炎患者的眼睛进行了检查。尽管由于技术原因在某些条件下(如闪烁场的形状和均匀性)存在差异,但两种方法在急性视神经炎诊断方面的特异性和敏感性相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验