Paster B J, Dewhirst F E, Olsen I, Fraser G J
Department of Molecular Genetics, Forsyth Dental Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
J Bacteriol. 1994 Feb;176(3):725-32. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.3.725-732.1994.
The phylogenetic structure of the bacteroides subgroup of the cytophaga-flavobacter-bacteroides (CFB) phylum was examined by 16S rRNA sequence comparative analysis. Approximately 95% of the 16S rRNA sequence was determined for 36 representative strains of species of Prevotella, Bacteroides, and Porphyromonas and related species by a modified Sanger sequencing method. A phylogenetic tree was constructed from a corrected distance matrix by the neighbor-joining method, and the reliability of tree branching was established by bootstrap analysis. The bacteroides subgroup was divided primarily into three major phylogenetic clusters which contained most of the species examined. The first cluster, termed the prevotella cluster, was composed of 16 species of Prevotella, including P. melaninogenica, P. intermedia, P. nigrescens, and the ruminal species P. ruminicola. Two oral species, P. zoogleoformans and P. heparinolytica, which had been recently placed in the genus Prevotella, did not fall within the prevotella cluster. These two species and six species of Bacteroides, including the type species B. fragilis, formed the second cluster, termed the bacteroides cluster. The third cluster, termed the porphyromonas cluster, was divided into two subclusters. The first contained Porphyromonas gingivalis, P. endodontalis, P. asaccharolytica, P. circumdentaria, P. salivosa, [Bacteroides] levii (the brackets around genus are used to indicate that the species does not belong to the genus by the sensu stricto definition), and [Bacteroides] macacae, and the second subcluster contained [Bacteroides] forsythus and [Bacteroides] distasonis. [Bacteroides] splanchnicus fell just outside the three major clusters but still belonged within the bacteroides subgroup. With few exceptions, the 16 S rRNA data were in overall agreement with previously proposed reclassifications of species of Bacteroides, Prevotella, and Porphyromonas. Suggestions are made to accommodate those species which do not fit previous reclassification schemes.
通过16S rRNA序列比较分析,研究了噬细胞-黄杆菌-拟杆菌(CFB)门拟杆菌亚组的系统发育结构。采用改良的桑格测序法,测定了普雷沃菌属、拟杆菌属、卟啉单胞菌属及相关菌种的36株代表性菌株约95%的16S rRNA序列。通过邻接法从校正后的距离矩阵构建系统发育树,并通过自展分析确定树分支的可靠性。拟杆菌亚组主要分为三个主要的系统发育簇,包含了大多数检测的菌种。第一个簇称为普雷沃菌簇,由16种普雷沃菌组成,包括产黑色素普雷沃菌、中间普雷沃菌、变黑普雷沃菌和瘤胃菌种瘤胃普雷沃菌。最近被归入普雷沃菌属的两种口腔菌种,即胶样普雷沃菌和肝素解普雷沃菌,并不属于普雷沃菌簇。这两个菌种和6种拟杆菌,包括模式菌种脆弱拟杆菌,形成了第二个簇,称为拟杆菌簇。第三个簇称为卟啉单胞菌簇,分为两个亚簇。第一个亚簇包含牙龈卟啉单胞菌、牙髓卟啉单胞菌、不解糖卟啉单胞菌、齿周卟啉单胞菌、唾液卟啉单胞菌、[拟杆菌属]列维菌(属名周围的方括号用于表示该菌种按严格定义不属于该属)和[拟杆菌属]猕猴菌,第二个亚簇包含[拟杆菌属]福赛坦菌和[拟杆菌属]狄氏菌。内脏拟杆菌刚好位于三个主要簇之外,但仍属于拟杆菌亚组。除少数例外,16S rRNA数据总体上与先前提出的拟杆菌属、普雷沃菌属和卟啉单胞菌属菌种的重新分类一致。针对那些不符合先前重新分类方案的菌种提出了建议。