Verheyen G, Pletincx I, Van Steirteghem A
Centre for Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University, Belgium.
Hum Reprod. 1993 Oct;8(10):1678-84. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137912.
Sixteen semen samples, 12 donor and four patient samples of high initial quality, were processed to compare the effect of two freezing methods, two thawing temperatures and the effect of dilution and washing on sperm motility and morphology characteristics. Sperm samples were divided in two equal parts and frozen either by fast vapour freezing or by slow computer-controlled freezing. For each freezing method, half of the straws were thawed at room temperature (22 degrees C), the other half were thawed at 37 degrees C. From each freeze-thawing treatment, one straw was evaluated immediately post-thawing; another straw was washed to remove the cryoprotectant solution. In this way, each semen sample was subjected to eight freeze-thawing treatments. No effect of the freezing method and thawing temperature was observed on motility characteristics evaluated by computer-assisted semen analysis, nor on light-microscopical morphology parameters. Post-thaw dilution and washing, however, exerted a deleterious effect on sperm motility, by reducing percentage motility by 50% compared to unwashed thawed specimens. Linearity and percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa were obviously impaired, while percentage of abnormal tails and beat cross frequency increased significantly. In general, freeze-thawing was most successful when rapid vapour freezing was followed by 37 degrees C thawing, and when slower computer-controlled freezing was combined with 22 degrees C thawing, causing significant interactions between the freezing method and the thawing temperature. For semen samples of high initial quality, vapour and computer-controlled freezing were equally effective in terms of recovery of morphologically normal, motile spermatozoa.
选取了16份精液样本,其中12份为供体样本,4份为初始质量较高的患者样本,对两种冷冻方法、两种解冻温度以及稀释和洗涤对精子活力和形态特征的影响进行了比较。将精子样本分成两等份,分别采用快速蒸汽冷冻或慢速计算机控制冷冻。对于每种冷冻方法,一半的细管在室温(22摄氏度)下解冻,另一半在37摄氏度下解冻。每种冻融处理后,一份细管在解冻后立即进行评估;另一份细管进行洗涤以去除冷冻保护剂溶液。这样,每份精液样本都接受了8种冻融处理。通过计算机辅助精液分析评估的活力特征,以及光学显微镜下的形态学参数,均未观察到冷冻方法和解冻温度的影响。然而,解冻后的稀释和洗涤对精子活力产生了有害影响,与未洗涤的解冻样本相比,活力百分比降低了50%。精子的线性度和形态正常精子的百分比明显受损,而异常尾部的百分比和鞭打交叉频率显著增加。总体而言,当快速蒸汽冷冻后在37摄氏度解冻,以及慢速计算机控制冷冻与22摄氏度解冻相结合时,冻融最为成功,这导致冷冻方法和解冻温度之间存在显著的相互作用。对于初始质量较高的精液样本,蒸汽冷冻和计算机控制冷冻在形态正常、有活力精子的回收率方面同样有效。