Conklin M T, Simko M D
Division of Applied Research, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg 39406-0077.
J Am Diet Assoc. 1994 Feb;94(2):174-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-8223(94)90243-7.
We explored the direct economic benefits of hospital dietetics departments sponsoring an internship for dietetics studies.
Forty-five dietetics departments in US hospitals participated in a mail survey that involved comprehensive data collection procedures using three instruments, including activity logs recorded by 298 dietitians and interns.
Direct benefits were defined as the net student labor provided to the department during routine and staff relief experiences that released professional labor for other work. Net student productivity during routine assignments was calculated by subtracting the time dietitians spent teaching during a typical work week from the amount of time dietetic interns spent performing professional services without direct supervision. Student productivity during staff relief rotations was calculated by multiplying the number of students assigned to this type of experience by the length of the rotation.
While involved in routine learning experiences, dietetic interns provided a direct benefit. The difference between the time interns spent in independent, professional service in the departments and the time dietitians spent in activities designed specifically for teaching was a mean of 29 hours in favor of the students. All departments received a direct benefit from assigning dietetic interns to a staff relief rotation. The median number of weeks of student labor gained by the departments per year was 24.
A paired t test was used to analyze the difference between the time dietitians devoted to teaching interns and the time students spent in independent, professional service in the departments. The difference was very highly significant (P < .001)
This study is a beginning step in objectively documenting positive outcomes associated with sponsoring a dietetic internship. It also represents a model that could be used by program directors to study the economic impact of their supervised practice program on the sponsoring organization.
我们探讨了医院营养科赞助营养学实习项目所带来的直接经济效益。
美国医院的45个营养科参与了一项邮件调查,该调查采用三种工具进行全面的数据收集程序,包括298名营养师和实习生记录的活动日志。
直接效益定义为学生在日常和替班工作中为科室提供的净劳动力,从而使专业人员能够腾出时间从事其他工作。日常任务中的学生净生产力通过从营养实习学生在无直接监督下从事专业服务的时间中减去营养师在典型工作周用于教学的时间来计算。替班轮值期间的学生生产力通过将分配到此类工作的学生人数乘以轮值时长来计算。
在参与日常学习活动时,营养实习生带来了直接效益。实习生在科室独立从事专业服务的时间与营养师专门用于教学活动的时间之差,平均有利于学生29小时。所有科室通过安排营养实习生进行替班轮值都获得了直接效益。各科室每年获得的学生劳动力周数中位数为24周。
采用配对t检验分析营养师用于指导实习生的时间与学生在科室独立从事专业服务的时间之间的差异。差异非常显著(P < .001)
本研究是客观记录赞助营养实习项目相关积极成果的第一步。它还代表了一种模式,项目主任可利用该模式研究其实习监督项目对赞助机构的经济影响。