• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项评估普萘洛尔在接受长期内镜硬化治疗患者中应用的前瞻性随机研究。

A prospective randomized study to evaluate propranolol in patients undergoing long-term endoscopic sclerotherapy.

作者信息

Acharya S K, Dasarathy S, Saksena S, Pande J N

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 1993 Sep;19(2):291-300. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(05)80585-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0168-8278(05)80585-9
PMID:8301064
Abstract

A prospective randomized double-blind study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of propranolol in patients with portal hypertension undergoing long-term endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST) for recurrent variceal bleeding. Consecutive patients with portal hypertension (Child's class A or B) due to cirrhosis (n = 72), non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis (n = 29) and extrahepatic portal venous obstruction (n = 13) attending the liver clinic of a tertiary care center were included in the study. All patients had had at least one documented episode of variceal bleed in the previous 4 weeks. Fifty-eight patients received propranolol and 56 received placebo in addition to weekly EST. Rebleeding occurred in 12 (21%) patients in the placebo group and 10 (17%) patients in the propranolol group during a mean follow-up period of 24.4 +/- 10.4 months in the former and 23.8 +/- 9.2 months in the latter group (P > 0.1). The number of episodes of rebleeding (14 in the placebo and 12 in the propranolol group) were also similar (P > 0.1). The median bleeding-free period was more than 40 months in both treatment groups (P > 0.1). The mean transfusion requirements and the number of hospital admissions for rebleeding were also similar in the two treatment groups (P > 0.1). Complete obliteration of varices was achieved in 44 (78.9%) patients in the placebo group and 43 (75.5%) patients in the propranolol group (P > 0.1). Recurrence of new varices was seen in two patients in the placebo and in three of those in the propranolol group. Seven patients in the placebo group and five in the propranolol group died (P > 0.1). Complications related to EST were similar in the two treatment groups but additional adverse effects were observed in the propranolol group. The cumulative incidence of rebleeding in the placebo group was 12.7 and in the propranolol group it was 11.2 per 100 patient years of follow-up. It is concluded that the addition of propranolol in patients with portal hypertension and fair hepatic function on long-term EST does not confer any additional benefit.

摘要

开展了一项前瞻性随机双盲研究,以评估普萘洛尔对接受长期内镜硬化疗法(EST)治疗复发性静脉曲张出血的门静脉高压患者的疗效。本研究纳入了一家三级医疗中心肝病门诊的连续患者,这些患者因肝硬化(n = 72)、非肝硬化性门静脉纤维化(n = 29)和肝外门静脉阻塞(n = 13)导致门静脉高压(Child分级A或B级)。所有患者在过去4周内至少有一次记录在案的静脉曲张出血发作。58例患者接受普萘洛尔治疗,56例患者除每周接受EST外还接受安慰剂治疗。在安慰剂组的12例(21%)患者和普萘洛尔组的10例(17%)患者中出现再出血,前者的平均随访期为24.4±10.4个月,后者为23.8±9.2个月(P>0.1)。再出血发作次数(安慰剂组14次,普萘洛尔组12次)也相似(P>0.1)。两个治疗组的无出血期中位数均超过40个月(P>0.1)。两个治疗组的平均输血需求量和因再出血的住院次数也相似(P>0.1)。安慰剂组44例(78.9%)患者和普萘洛尔组43例(75.5%)患者实现了静脉曲张完全闭塞(P>0.1)。安慰剂组有2例患者和普萘洛尔组有3例患者出现新静脉曲张复发。安慰剂组7例患者和普萘洛尔组5例患者死亡(P>0.1)。两个治疗组与EST相关的并发症相似,但在普萘洛尔组观察到了额外的不良反应。安慰剂组每100患者年随访的再出血累积发生率为12.7,普萘洛尔组为11.2。结论是,对于门静脉高压且肝功能尚可的患者,在长期EST治疗中加用普萘洛尔不会带来任何额外益处。

相似文献

1
A prospective randomized study to evaluate propranolol in patients undergoing long-term endoscopic sclerotherapy.一项评估普萘洛尔在接受长期内镜硬化治疗患者中应用的前瞻性随机研究。
J Hepatol. 1993 Sep;19(2):291-300. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(05)80585-9.
2
Propranolol in the prevention of recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis undergoing endoscopic sclerotherapy. A randomized controlled trial.普萘洛尔预防肝硬化患者内镜下硬化治疗后上消化道出血复发的随机对照试验。
J Hepatol. 1993 Sep;19(2):301-11. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(05)80586-0.
3
Long-term outcome after sclerotherapy with or without a beta-blocker for variceal bleeding in children.儿童静脉曲张出血采用或不采用β受体阻滞剂进行硬化治疗后的长期预后。
Pediatr Int. 2003 Aug;45(4):388-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-200x.2003.01743.x.
4
Propranolol or endoscopic sclerotherapy in the prevention of recurrence of variceal bleeding. A prospective, randomized controlled trial.普萘洛尔或内镜下硬化治疗预防静脉曲张出血复发:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Hepatol. 1988 Oct;7(2):175-85. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(88)80480-x.
5
Outcome of injection sclerotherapy using absolute alcohol in patients with cirrhosis, non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis, and extrahepatic portal venous obstruction.使用无水酒精进行注射硬化疗法治疗肝硬化、非肝硬化性门脉纤维化及肝外门静脉阻塞患者的疗效
Gastrointest Endosc. 1991 Jul-Aug;37(4):460-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70780-3.
6
[Prevention of recurrent hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis. Results of a controlled trial of propranolol versus endoscopic sclerotherapy].[肝硬化患者复发性出血的预防。普萘洛尔与内镜硬化治疗对照试验的结果]
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1991;15(11):833-7.
7
Comparative efficacy of emergency endoscopic sclerotherapy for active variceal bleeding due to cirrhosis of the liver, non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis and extrahepatic portal venous obstruction.急诊内镜硬化治疗对肝硬化、非肝硬化门静脉纤维化和肝外门静脉阻塞所致活动性静脉曲张出血的比较疗效
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1990 Jul-Aug;5(4):432-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1990.tb01422.x.
8
A prospective randomized trial comparing repeated endoscopic sclerotherapy and propranolol in decompensated (Child class B and C) cirrhotic patients.一项比较重复内镜下硬化疗法与普萘洛尔对失代偿期(Child B级和C级)肝硬化患者疗效的前瞻性随机试验。
Hepatology. 1992 Jul;16(1):89-94. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840160116.
9
Efficacy of endoscopic sclerotherapy on long-term management of oesophageal varices: a comparative study of results in patients with cirrhosis of the liver, non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis (NCPF) and extrahepatic portal venous obstruction (EHO).内镜硬化治疗对食管静脉曲张长期管理的疗效:肝硬化、非肝硬化门静脉纤维化(NCPF)和肝外门静脉阻塞(EHO)患者结果的比较研究
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1991 Sep-Oct;6(5):471-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1991.tb00890.x.
10
Endoscopic sclerotherapy versus propranolol in prevention of recurrent variceal bleeding in patients with child's B and C cirrhosis: a preliminary report.内镜下硬化治疗与普萘洛尔预防Child B级和C级肝硬化患者静脉曲张再出血的初步报告
Indian J Gastroenterol. 1992 Apr;11(2):68-70.

引用本文的文献

1
Carvedilol and traditional nonselective beta blockers for the secondary prophylaxis of variceal hemorrhage and portal hypertension related complications among patients with decompensated cirrhosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.卡维地洛与传统非选择性β受体阻滞剂用于失代偿期肝硬化患者静脉曲张出血及门静脉高压相关并发症的二级预防:一项系统评价与网状Meta分析
Hepatol Int. 2025 Apr 3. doi: 10.1007/s12072-025-10812-8.
2
Etiological Spectrum of Cirrhosis in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.印度肝硬化的病因谱:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2024 Mar-Apr;14(2):101291. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2023.10.002. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
3
Secondary prevention of variceal bleeding in adults with previous oesophageal variceal bleeding due to decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.
肝硬化失代偿期食管静脉曲张出血患者的二级预防:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 30;3(3):CD013122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013122.pub2.
4
A fourfold increase of oesophageal variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with a history of oesophageal variceal bleeding.有食管静脉曲张出血病史的肝硬化患者,食管静脉曲张出血增加了四倍。
Singapore Med J. 2016 Sep;57(9):511-3. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2015177. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
5
Benefit of combination β-blocker and endoscopic treatment to prevent variceal rebleeding: a meta-analysis.联合β受体阻滞剂和内镜治疗预防静脉曲张再出血的益处:一项荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Dec 21;16(47):5982-92. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i47.5982.
6
Avoiding pitfalls: what an endoscopist should know in liver transplantation--part 1.避免陷阱:肝移植内镜医师应知事项——第1部分
Dig Dis Sci. 2008 Jul;53(7):1757-73. doi: 10.1007/s10620-007-0079-8. Epub 2007 Nov 9.
7
Current management of portal hypertension.门静脉高压的当前管理。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2005 Sep-Oct;9(7):992-1005. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.09.028.
8
Systemic and hepatic hemodynamics in hepatosplenic Manson's schistosomiasis with and without propranolol.有或无普萘洛尔情况下肝脾型曼氏血吸虫病的全身和肝脏血流动力学
Dig Dis Sci. 1997 Apr;42(4):751-61. doi: 10.1023/a:1018803911915.