Schumock G T, Crawford S Y, Giusto D A, Hutchinson R A
Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago 60612.
Pharmacotherapy. 1993 Nov-Dec;13(6):668-72.
The responsibilities of clinical faculty members are often multifaceted and may include direct patient care, didactic and experiential teaching, research, and administrative duties. Specialization, poorly defined standards of care, and lack of direct supervision have traditionally made performance evaluation difficult. We implemented a method to evaluate clinical faculty as they carried out patient care activities using a revised template for the evaluation of a clinical pharmacist developed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Clinical Practice Affairs Committee. In addition, it allows individuals to report and evaluate their own performance in the areas of patient care, instructional activity, university and public service, research and scholarly activities, and administrative duties. Teaching evaluations from clerkship students and residents are also submitted and assessed during the annual interview. To determine the usefulness of the evaluation, including the template, we surveyed the opinions of clinical faculty (nontenured) at four primary practice sites (response rate 92%). Mean scores for responses suggested agreement with statements as to the merits of the evaluation system; however, there was some variation among practice sites. Incorporating the template into a broad evaluation system was effective in facilitating improved job performance and career development. Adaptation of the template may be practice site dependent and should be coordinated by a participative approach. Additional assessment may be facilitated by physician, nurse, or peer evaluation.
临床教员的职责往往是多方面的,可能包括直接的患者护理、理论与实践教学、研究以及行政职责。传统上,专业化、护理标准定义不明确以及缺乏直接监督使得绩效评估变得困难。我们实施了一种方法来评估临床教员在开展患者护理活动时的表现,该方法使用了美国临床药学院临床实践事务委员会制定的修订版临床药剂师评估模板。此外,它还允许个人报告和评估自己在患者护理、教学活动、大学与公共服务、研究与学术活动以及行政职责等方面的表现。在年度面谈期间,还会提交和评估来自见习学生和住院医师的教学评价。为了确定包括该模板在内的评估的有用性,我们调查了四个主要实践地点的临床教员(非终身教职)的意见(回复率为92%)。回复的平均分数表明对评估系统的优点的陈述达成了一致;然而,不同实践地点之间存在一些差异。将该模板纳入广泛的评估系统有效地促进了工作绩效的提高和职业发展。模板的调整可能取决于实践地点,应该通过参与式方法进行协调。医生、护士或同行评估可能有助于进行额外的评估。