Haines Stuart T, Sicat Brigitte L, Haines Seena L, MacLaughlin Eric J, Van Amburgh Jenny A
University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland.
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy, Richmond, Virginia.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 May 25;80(4):60. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80460.
Objective. To determine what processes and metrics are employed to measure and evaluate pharmacy practice faculty members at colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States. Methods. A 23-item web-based questionnaire was distributed to pharmacy practice department chairs at schools of pharmacy fully accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) (n=114). Results. Ninety-three pharmacy practice chairs or designees from 92 institutions responded. Seventy-six percent reported that more than 60% of the department's faculty members were engaged in practice-related activities at least eight hours per week. Fewer than half (47%) had written policies and procedures for conducting practice evaluations. Institutions commonly collected data regarding committee service at practice sites, community service events, educational programs, and number of hours engaged in practice-related activities; however, only 24% used a tool to longitudinally collect practice-related data. Publicly funded institutions were more likely than private schools to have written procedures. Conclusion. Data collection tools and best practice recommendations for conducting faculty practice evaluations are needed.
目的。确定在美国药学院校中,用于衡量和评估药学实践教员的流程和指标有哪些。方法。向获得药学教育认证委员会(ACPE)全面认证的药学院校的药学实践系主任发放了一份包含23个项目的网络调查问卷(n = 114)。结果。来自92所机构的93位药学实践系主任或其指定人员做出了回应。76%的受访者表示,该系超过60%的教员每周至少有8小时参与与实践相关的活动。不到一半(47%)的机构制定了进行实践评估的书面政策和程序。各机构通常收集有关实践场所的委员会服务、社区服务活动、教育项目以及参与与实践相关活动的时长等数据;然而,只有24%的机构使用工具纵向收集与实践相关的数据。公立机构比私立学校更有可能制定书面程序。结论。需要用于教员实践评估的数据收集工具和最佳实践建议。