• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

审前宣传对模拟强奸审判中男女陪审员及法官的影响。

Effects of pretrial publicity on male and female jurors and judges in a mock rape trial.

作者信息

Riedel R G

机构信息

Colorado State University.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 1993 Dec;73(3 Pt 1):819-32. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1993.73.3.819.

DOI:10.2466/pr0.1993.73.3.819
PMID:8302986
Abstract

A study explored influence of pretrial publicity and gender identity on verdicts and severity of sentence in a mock rape trial. Mock jurors and judges were exposed to four pretrial publicity conditions before watching a simulated rape trial. After viewing the trial, jurors rendered a verdict (guilty or not guilty) and judges prescribed a sentence. The Bem Sex-role Inventory was used to analyze gender identity and its relation to verdict and sentencing. Verdicts were not influenced by pretrial publicity, but sentencing was more severe following exposure of mock judges to pretrial publicity about a mistaken acquittal and less severe following exposure of these judges to pretrial publicity about a mistaken conviction. Subjects classified by the Bem inventory as feminine or androgynous rendered a verdict of "guilty" more often than subjects classified as masculine or undifferentiated. Men who rendered verdicts of "guilty" had less confidence in their judgments than men who found the defendant "not guilty." Conversely, women who found the defendant "not guilty" expressed less confidence than women who found the defendant "guilty." The findings are compared and contrasted with similar studies and discussed in regards to gender identity, subjects' characteristics, and mode of presentation.

摘要

一项研究探讨了审前宣传和性别认同对模拟强奸审判中判决结果及量刑轻重的影响。模拟陪审员和法官在观看一场模拟强奸审判之前,被置于四种审前宣传条件下。观看审判后,陪审员做出裁决(有罪或无罪),法官进行量刑。使用贝姆性别角色量表来分析性别认同及其与裁决和量刑的关系。裁决不受审前宣传的影响,但在模拟法官接触到关于误判无罪的审前宣传后,量刑更为严厉;而在这些法官接触到关于误判有罪的审前宣传后,量刑则没那么严厉。根据贝姆量表被归类为女性化或双性化的受试者比被归类为男性化或未分化的受试者更常做出“有罪”裁决。做出“有罪”裁决的男性对自己判断的信心低于判定被告“无罪”的男性。相反,判定被告“无罪”的女性比判定被告“有罪”的女性表现出的信心更低。研究结果与类似研究进行了比较和对比,并就性别认同、受试者特征和呈现方式进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Effects of pretrial publicity on male and female jurors and judges in a mock rape trial.审前宣传对模拟强奸审判中男女陪审员及法官的影响。
Psychol Rep. 1993 Dec;73(3 Pt 1):819-32. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1993.73.3.819.
2
From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.从阴影走向光明:审前宣传和审议如何影响模拟陪审员的决策、印象和记忆。
Law Hum Behav. 2015 Jun;39(3):294-310. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000117. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
3
General pretrial publicity in sexual assault trials.
Psychol Rep. 2007 Oct;101(2):527-30. doi: 10.2466/pr0.101.2.527-530.
4
Understanding pretrial publicity: predecisional distortion of evidence by mock jurors.理解审前宣传:模拟陪审员对证据的判决前歪曲
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2004 Jun;10(2):111-9. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.10.2.111.
5
Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.保持偏见:与具有不同偏见的他人协商如何影响模拟陪审员的有罪判决、对被告的看法、记忆和证据解释。
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Oct;41(5):478-493. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000256. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
6
Negative and positive pretrial publicity affect juror memory and decision making.审前的负面和正面宣传会影响陪审员的记忆和决策。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2008 Sep;14(3):226-35. doi: 10.1037/1076-898X.14.3.226.
7
How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.借口辩护类型、模拟陪审员年龄和被告年龄如何影响模拟陪审员的决策。
J Soc Psychol. 2007 Aug;147(4):371-92. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.147.4.371-392.
8
The impact of pretrial publicity on mock juror and jury verdicts: A meta-analysis.审前宣传对模拟陪审员和陪审团裁决的影响:一项元分析。
Law Hum Behav. 2022 Apr;46(2):121-139. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000473. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
9
Who bought the drinks? Juror perceptions of intoxication in a rape trial.谁买的饮料?强奸案审判中陪审员对醉酒的感知。
J Interpers Violence. 2013 Nov;28(16):3205-22. doi: 10.1177/0886260513496900. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
10
A third verdict option: exploring the impact of the not proven verdict on mock juror decision making.第三种裁决选项:探究“未经证实”裁决对模拟陪审员决策的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2008 Jun;32(3):241-52. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9106-8. Epub 2007 Aug 17.