Ross J L, Upp M M
Soc Secur Bull. 1993 Fall;56(3):56-67.
This article, a reprint of a paper presented in 1988 to the International Social Security Association, traces the debate from 1970 through 1988 over treatment of women in the Social Security system. It traces issues relating to working women, couples with two earners, homemakers, widows, and divorced women. It describes the debate that led to widespread support for the concept of earnings sharing. It then addresses the paradox that despite continued widespread support for earnings sharing, despite continuation of the factors underlying its proposal, by 1988 no comprehensive legislation related to the treatment of women under Social Security had been enacted nor was being generally contemplated. This is still true in 1993. The article argues that apparently insoluble, inherent conflicts among the objectives underlying earnings sharing ultimately doomed its enactment. Cost considerations, the realization of unintended side effects, and issues relating to transition to a very different Social Security system also helped remove earnings sharing from the legislative agenda. The article also describes the role policy analysis played in the debate over this proposed reform.
本文是1988年提交给国际社会保障协会的一篇论文的重印版,追溯了1970年至1988年期间社会保障体系中对女性待遇问题的辩论。它探讨了与职业女性、双职工夫妇、家庭主妇、寡妇和离婚女性相关的问题。它描述了引发对收入分享概念广泛支持的辩论。接着,文章论述了一个自相矛盾的现象:尽管对收入分享仍普遍支持,尽管提出这一概念的相关因素依然存在,但到1988年,仍未颁布且未普遍考虑出台任何与社会保障体系下女性待遇相关的全面立法。1993年情况依然如此。文章认为,收入分享背后目标之间明显无法解决的内在冲突最终注定了其无法颁布实施。成本考量、意外副作用的出现以及向截然不同的社会保障体系过渡的相关问题,也促使收入分享从立法议程中被移除。文章还描述了政策分析在这场拟议改革辩论中所起的作用。