Suppr超能文献

双标记水法估算绵羊二氧化碳产生量的验证

Validation in sheep of the doubly labeled water method for estimating CO2 production.

作者信息

Midwood A J, Haggarty P, McGaw B A, Mollison G S, Milne E, Duncan G J

机构信息

Rowett Research Institute, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Am J Physiol. 1994 Jan;266(1 Pt 2):R169-79. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1994.266.1.R169.

Abstract

Carbon dioxide production (rCO2) was estimated in four sheep over a period of 10 days using doubly labeled water (2H and 18O) and was compared with simultaneous respiration chamber measurements of CO2. The excess 2H and 18O measurements were corrected for the empirically determined effects of isotope rebreathing within the confines of the chambers. A weighted monoexponential curve was then fitted to the data from which isotope flux rates and ultimately rCO2 and water turnover (rH2O) estimates were made. The curve fits were weighted assuming a Poisson model. Selection of this weighting policy did not bias the results, and curvature in the data also appeared to have little effect on the rCO2 estimates. Fractionated evaporative water loss expressed as a fraction of rH2O (X) was estimated from water balance and breath water production estimates; the mean X was 0.145 and ranged from 0.108 to 0.183. Corrections for 2H loss in fecal solids reduced the mean rH2O (4,746 g/day) by 35.5 g/day and increased the mean rCO2 (332.3 l/day) by 21.2 l/day. Further corrections to account for 2H loss in methane (mean production rate 27.2 l/day) reduced rH2O by 33.8 g/day and increased rCO2 by 20.3 l/day. The final isotopic estimates of rH2O were 14.6 +/- 6.59% (n = 4) lower than direct measurements and the mean rCO2 was 3.5 +/- 14.48% (n = 4) lower than the chamber measured rCO2. However, in one of the animals studied the rCO2 deviated markedly from the chamber-derived value, and this discrepancy has yet to be explained. When this animal was excluded from the comparisons, the standard deviation was greatly reduced (+/- 3.6, n = 3) and the mean overall error on rCO2 was +3.6%.

摘要

在10天的时间里,使用双标记水(2H和18O)对4只绵羊的二氧化碳产生量(rCO2)进行了估算,并与同时通过呼吸室测量的二氧化碳量进行了比较。对多余的2H和18O测量值进行了校正,以消除在呼吸室内根据经验确定的同位素再呼吸效应。然后对数据拟合加权单指数曲线,据此得出同位素通量率,并最终估算出rCO2和水周转率(rH2O)。假设为泊松模型对曲线拟合进行加权。选择这种加权策略不会使结果产生偏差,而且数据中的曲率似乎对rCO2估算值也几乎没有影响。根据水平衡和呼气水产生量估算值,计算出以rH2O的分数表示的分馏蒸发失水量(X);X的平均值为0.145,范围在0.108至0.183之间。对粪便固体中2H损失的校正使rH2O的平均值(4746克/天)减少了35.5克/天,使rCO2的平均值(332.3升/天)增加了21.2升/天。对甲烷中2H损失(平均产生率为27.2升/天)的进一步校正使rH2O减少了33.8克/天,使rCO2增加了20.3升/天。rH2O的最终同位素估算值比直接测量值低14.6±6.59%(n = 4),rCO2的平均值比呼吸室测量的rCO2低3.5±14.48%(n = 4)。然而,在研究的一只动物中,rCO2与呼吸室得出的值明显不同,这种差异尚待解释。当将这只动物排除在比较之外时,标准偏差大幅降低(±3.6,n = 3),rCO2的总体平均误差为+3.6%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验