Suppr超能文献

双标记水技术的实验可靠性

Experimental reliability of the doubly labeled water technique.

作者信息

Goran M I, Poehlman E T, Danforth E

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington 05405.

出版信息

Am J Physiol. 1994 Mar;266(3 Pt 1):E510-5. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1994.266.3.E510.

Abstract

The experimental reliability of measuring CO2 production rates (rCO2) with the doubly labeled water (DLW) technique was assessed in five young healthy men (23 (DLW) technique was assessed in five young healthy men (23 +/- 4 yr; 66.1 +/- 4.6 kg). To minimize the confounding effects of fluctuations in physical activity and eating patterns on variation in energy expenditure, the subjects lived under sedentary living conditions by confinement to their own room at a Clinical Research Center and were maintained on a fixed and known level of energy intake. rCO2 was determined in duplicate over two identical 9-day study periods after separate loading doses of deuterium and oxygen-18. Turnover rates were determined from multipoint sampling to reduce error from analytical uncertainty. Dilution spaces were determined by both the intercept and plateau methods. The average experimental variation for rCO2 estimates was approximately +/- 8.5% and was not significantly different among three published calculation models that differ in their assumptions regarding the relationship between the dilution spaces of deuterium and oxygen-18. The experimental reliability of +/- 8.5% exceeds theoretical values generated from calculations based on propagation of error from analytical uncertainty. Between subjects, the experimental variation ranged from 1 to 21%, and the half-width of the 95% confidence interval for the precision of rCO2 estimates was high (+/- 12 mol/day) relative to the mean reported value of approximately 16 mol/day.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在五名年轻健康男性(23±4岁;66.1±4.6千克)中评估了用双标记水(DLW)技术测量二氧化碳产生率(rCO2)的实验可靠性。为了将身体活动和饮食模式波动对能量消耗变化的混杂影响降至最低,受试者在临床研究中心被限制在自己房间内,处于久坐生活条件下,并维持在固定且已知的能量摄入水平。在分别给予氘和氧-18的负荷剂量后,在两个相同的9天研究期内对rCO2进行了两次测定。通过多点采样确定周转率,以减少分析不确定性带来的误差。通过截距法和平台法确定稀释空间。rCO2估计值的平均实验变异约为±8.5%,在关于氘和氧-18稀释空间之间关系的假设不同的三个已发表计算模型中,该变异无显著差异。±8.5%的实验可靠性超过了基于分析不确定性误差传播计算得出的理论值。在受试者之间,实验变异范围为1%至21%,相对于约16摩尔/天的平均报告值,rCO2估计精度的95%置信区间半宽较高(±12摩尔/天)。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验