Suppr超能文献

院前小儿癫痫持续状态的直肠用地西泮治疗。

Rectal diazepam for prehospital pediatric status epilepticus.

作者信息

Dieckmann R A

机构信息

Department of Emergency Services, San Francisco General Hospital.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Feb;23(2):216-24. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70034-6.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To compare the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of rectal diazepam and intravenous diazepam in the treatment of pediatric prehospital status epilepticus.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective analysis of a 30-month consecutive sample of ambulance-transported children in a large urban emergency medical service region.

TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS

Study group included 324 patients with seizure who were less than 18 years of age; 36 had status epilepticus, of whom 16 received rectal diazepam and 15 received IV diazepam.

INTERVENTIONS

For children with status epilepticus, paramedics administered the 5-mg/mL IV solution of diazepam by one of two routes: rectally either through a 5F feeding tube with an attached syringe or by lubricated tuberculin syringe inserted 4 to 5 cm into the rectum at a one-time dose of 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg or intravenously using a one-time dose of 0.1 to 0.3 mg/kg. Cardiopulmonary status was carefully monitored in the field and emergency department.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen of 16 children (81%) who received rectal diazepam stopped seizing after a single dose ranging from 0.16 to 0.57 mg/kg. Convulsions recurred before arrival at the ED in four of the 13 (30.8%). All of three patients who did not respond to rectal diazepam initially were 3 to 5 years old and had serious underlying comorbidity; two required endotracheal intubation in the ED and multiple anticonvulsants to terminate the seizure. No child treated with rectal diazepam required prehospital endotracheal intubation. All children who received IV diazepam stopped seizing after one dose ranging from 0.04 to 0.33 mg/kg. Convulsions recurred before arrival at the ED in nine of 15 children (60%); two required prehospital endotracheal intubation for profound respiratory depression.

CONCLUSION

Rectal diazepam is a simple, effective, and safe method of prehospital management of pediatric status epilepticus. Compared with IV diazepam, rectal diazepam is easier to administer, especially in infants and toddlers; is equally efficacious; and is less likely to produce respiratory depression. Although respiratory depression is rare with rectal diazepam, prehospital personnel must be prepared to provide definitive respiratory support. Short duration of action is an important limitation of both treatments.

摘要

研究目的

比较直肠用安定和静脉用安定治疗小儿院前癫痫持续状态的可行性、有效性和安全性。

设计与背景

对一个大城市紧急医疗服务区30个月内连续转运的救护车患儿样本进行回顾性分析。

研究对象类型

研究组包括324例年龄小于18岁的癫痫发作患儿;其中36例为癫痫持续状态,16例接受直肠用安定治疗,15例接受静脉用安定治疗。

干预措施

对于癫痫持续状态的患儿,护理人员通过以下两种途径之一给予5mg/mL的静脉用安定溶液:经直肠给药,通过连接注射器的5F喂食管,或将润滑后的结核菌素注射器插入直肠4至5cm,一次性剂量为0.2至0.5mg/kg;或静脉给药,一次性剂量为0.1至0.3mg/kg。在现场和急诊科对心肺状况进行仔细监测。

测量指标与主要结果

16例接受直肠用安定治疗的患儿中,13例(81%)在单次剂量为0.16至0.57mg/kg后停止抽搐。13例中有4例(30.8%)在到达急诊科之前抽搐复发。最初对直肠用安定无反应的3例患者均为3至5岁,并有严重的基础合并症;2例在急诊科需要气管插管,并使用多种抗惊厥药物来终止抽搐。接受直肠用安定治疗的患儿在院前均无需气管插管。所有接受静脉用安定治疗的患儿在单次剂量为0.04至0.33mg/kg后停止抽搐。15例患儿中有9例(60%)在到达急诊科之前抽搐复发;2例因严重呼吸抑制在院前需要气管插管。

结论

直肠用安定是小儿院前癫痫持续状态管理的一种简单、有效且安全的方法。与静脉用安定相比,直肠用安定更易于给药,尤其是在婴幼儿中;疗效相当;且较少引起呼吸抑制。虽然直肠用安定引起呼吸抑制的情况罕见,但院前人员必须做好提供确定性呼吸支持的准备。作用时间短是两种治疗方法的一个重要局限性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验