Chouinard G, Annable L, Turnier L, Holobow N, Szkrumelak N
Psychiatric Research Centre, Louis-H. Lafontaine Hospital, Montreal, Quebec.
Can J Psychiatry. 1993 Nov;38 Suppl 4:S114-21.
This double-blind clinical trial studied 16 acutely agitated psychotic patients with manic or manic-like symptoms who needed rapid tranquilization and were therefore on maintenance treatment. They were randomized to receive intramuscular preparations of clonazepam (1 to 2 mg) or haloperidol (5 to 10 mg) at 0, 0.5, and 1.0 hours. Both medications produced significant reduction of manic symptoms within two hours of initial treatment; however, haloperidol produced beneficial results more rapidly than clonazepam. All patients completed the study, with the exception of one haloperidol-treated patient who developed severe parkinsonism. It was concluded that I.M. clonazepam is an effective, safe, but slower-acting alternative to I.M. haloperidol in the treatment of agitated psychiatric patients in need of rapid tranquilization.
这项双盲临床试验研究了16名患有躁狂或类躁狂症状的急性激越性精神病患者,这些患者需要快速镇静,因此正在接受维持治疗。他们被随机分为在0、0.5和1.0小时接受氯硝西泮(1至2毫克)或氟哌啶醇(5至10毫克)的肌肉注射制剂。两种药物在初始治疗两小时内均使躁狂症状显著减轻;然而,氟哌啶醇比氯硝西泮起效更快。除一名接受氟哌啶醇治疗的患者出现严重帕金森症外,所有患者均完成了研究。得出的结论是,在治疗需要快速镇静的激越性精神病患者时,肌肉注射氯硝西泮是一种有效、安全但起效较慢的替代肌肉注射氟哌啶醇的方法。