• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

溴西泮与普拉西泮治疗非精神病性焦虑的比较双盲研究

[Comparative double-blind study of bromazepam versus prazepam in non-psychotic anxiety].

作者信息

Guelfi J D, Lancrenon S, Millet V

机构信息

Clinique des Maladies Mentales et de l'Encéphale, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, Paris.

出版信息

Encephale. 1993 Sep-Oct;19(5):547-52.

PMID:8306923
Abstract

The efficacy of bromazepam and prazepam for the different components of anxiety: inhibition, asthenia and somatisation is evaluated in a multi-centric, comparative and randomised study, conducted as double blind and in parallel groups in 159 adult patients showing a manifest anxiety according to the F.D.A. criteria. After a 7 day wash-out period, the patients receive either bromazepam in a 12 mg/d dose or prazepam in a 40 mg/d dose, over 4 weeks (D0-D28), then in a decreasing dose from D28 to D43; follow-up is carried out using the anxious inhibition scale W.P.2, auto-questionnaire A.D.A., the Hamilton anxiety scale and the Tyrer questionnaire (benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms questionnaire). Patients are evaluated seven times during the study: at day 7 for inclusion, day 0 for randomisation, then day 7 and day 14 for following visits, at day 28 for efficacy and tolerance evaluation, and at day 50 for utilisation and withdrawal evaluation. The major efficacy criteria are the evolution of inhibition, asthenia and somatisation as compounds of anxiety respectively evaluated by W.P.2 scale, asthenic partial score of autoquestionnaire A.D.A. and somatic partial score of Hamilton anxiety scale. The analysis of results don't show any significant difference between the two groups on the evolution of the components asthenia and inhibition. However the evolution of the somatic component clearly makes a significant difference in favour of bromazepam. There is also a significant difference in terms of global anxiolytic action efficacy, in favour of bromazepam.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在一项多中心、比较性和随机研究中,对159名根据美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)标准表现出明显焦虑的成年患者进行双盲平行分组,评估溴西泮和普拉西泮对焦虑不同成分(抑制、乏力和躯体化)的疗效。经过7天的洗脱期后,患者在4周内(D0 - D28)接受12毫克/天剂量的溴西泮或40毫克/天剂量的普拉西泮治疗,然后从D28到D43逐渐减量;使用焦虑抑制量表W.P.2、自评问卷A.D.A.、汉密尔顿焦虑量表和泰勒问卷(苯二氮䓬撤药症状问卷)进行随访。在研究期间对患者进行7次评估:第7天为纳入期,第0天为随机分组,然后第7天和第14天为随访,第28天进行疗效和耐受性评估,第50天进行用药和撤药评估。主要疗效标准是分别通过W.P.2量表评估的焦虑成分抑制、乏力和躯体化的变化,自评问卷A.D.A.的乏力部分得分以及汉密尔顿焦虑量表的躯体部分得分。结果分析显示,两组在乏力和抑制成分的变化上没有显著差异。然而,躯体成分的变化明显有利于溴西泮。在整体抗焦虑作用疗效方面也存在显著差异,有利于溴西泮。(摘要截取自250字)

相似文献

1
[Comparative double-blind study of bromazepam versus prazepam in non-psychotic anxiety].溴西泮与普拉西泮治疗非精神病性焦虑的比较双盲研究
Encephale. 1993 Sep-Oct;19(5):547-52.
2
[Comparison of 6 different methods for lorazepam withdrawal. A controlled study, hydroxyzine versus placebo].[6种不同劳拉西泮撤药方法的比较。一项对照研究,羟嗪与安慰剂对比]
Encephale. 1997 Jul-Aug;23(4):290-9.
3
[Efficacy and tolerance of alprazolam and bromazepam in flexible doses. Double-blind study in 119 ambulatory anxious patients].阿普唑仑和溴西泮灵活剂量的疗效与耐受性。119例门诊焦虑患者的双盲研究
Encephale. 1987 Mar-Apr;13(2):89-95.
4
[Treatment of anxiety with prazepam, 40 mg. A controlled study versus lorazepam].用40毫克普拉西泮治疗焦虑症。与劳拉西泮的对照研究
Encephale. 1984;10(3):135-8.
5
Double-blind, comparative study of cyamemazine vs. bromazepam in the benzodiazepine withdrawal syndrome.氰美马嗪与溴西泮治疗苯二氮䓬类药物戒断综合征的双盲对照研究。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;30(1):131-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2005.08.015. Epub 2005 Oct 21.
6
Deramciclane in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose-finding study.德洛环烷治疗广泛性焦虑症:一项安慰剂对照、双盲、剂量探索研究。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005 Dec;15(6):617-23. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2005.03.002. Epub 2005 Jun 9.
7
[Prazepam drops versus 10 mg prazepam tablets in anxious patients in ambulatory care].门诊护理中焦虑患者使用普拉西泮滴剂与10毫克普拉西泮片剂的对比研究
Therapie. 1990 Nov-Dec;45(6):467-70.
8
A multi-centre comparison of prazepam and diazepam in the treatment of anxiety.氯氮䓬与地西泮治疗焦虑症的多中心比较
Pharmatherapeutica. 1983;3(6):433-40.
9
Bromazepam, a new anxiolytic: a comparative study with diazepam in general practice. Royal College of General Practitioners Medicines Surveillance Organisation.溴马西泮,一种新型抗焦虑药:与地西泮在全科医疗中的对比研究。皇家全科医师学院药物监测组织。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 Sep;34(266):509-12.
10
[Modification of cognitive functions by 2 anxiolytic treatments in patients suffering from generalized anxiety].[两种抗焦虑治疗对广泛性焦虑症患者认知功能的影响]
Encephale. 1995 Mar-Apr;21(2):147-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigation into self-medication of drugs for primary and adjunct therapy in psychiatric diseases among students in chittagong city of bangladesh: a comparison between medical and nonmedical students.孟加拉国吉大港医科与非医科学生治疗精神疾病的自我用药及辅助治疗调查:医科学生与非医科学生的比较
Indian J Psychol Med. 2012 Oct;34(4):313-7. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.108195.