Kibayashi K, Hamada K, Honjyo K, Tsunenari S
Department of Forensic Medicine, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, Japan.
Forensic Sci Int. 1993 Oct;61(2-3):111-7. doi: 10.1016/0379-0738(93)90219-z.
In a differential study to distinguish bruises from putrefactive discoloration, glycophorin A, a component of the erythrocyte membrane, was extracted from discolored skins and detected by immunological methods utilizing an anti-glycophorin A serum. Skin samples of 18 bruises, 8 postmortem hypostasises and 7 putrefactive discolorations were removed from 27 bodies in which postmortem intervals ranged from 4 h to 2.5 months. In 13 out of the 18 bruises (72.2%), glycophorin A was detected by the immunological methods. It was noted that glycophorin A was detectable even in a severely putrefied body 10 days after death. In contrast, no glycophorin A was detected in any of the postmortem lividities or the putrefactive discolorations. These results suggest that the absence of glycophorin A does not always indicate a skin discoloration of postmortem origin, but a positive glycophorin A reaction does indicate a skin discoloration due to bruise.
在一项区分瘀伤与腐败变色的鉴别研究中,从变色皮肤中提取红细胞膜成分血型糖蛋白A,并利用抗血型糖蛋白A血清通过免疫方法进行检测。从27具尸体上取下18处瘀伤、8处尸斑和7处腐败变色的皮肤样本,这些尸体的死后间隔时间为4小时至2.5个月。在18处瘀伤中的13处(72.2%),通过免疫方法检测到了血型糖蛋白A。值得注意的是,即使在死后10天的严重腐败尸体中也能检测到血型糖蛋白A。相比之下,在任何尸斑或腐败变色中均未检测到血型糖蛋白A。这些结果表明,血型糖蛋白A的缺失并不总是表明皮肤变色是死后形成的,但血型糖蛋白A反应呈阳性确实表明皮肤变色是由瘀伤引起的。