Suppr超能文献

老年与年轻持续性腹膜透析患者感染率的比较。

A comparison of infection rates among older and younger patients on continuous peritoneal dialysis.

作者信息

Holley J L, Bernardini J, Perlmutter J A, Piraino B

机构信息

Renal-Electrolyte Division, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Perit Dial Int. 1994;14(1):66-9.

PMID:8312418
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if peritoneal dialysis-related infection rates are higher in older patients compared with younger patients.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Control adult patients were matched with older study patients for race, sex, insulin dependence, connection device, and time on dialysis.

SETTING

A university-based peritoneal dialysis program which includes patients from a Veterans Administration Hospital outpatient dialysis program.

PATIENTS

Infection rates of 103 patients 60 years of age (older patients) were compared with 103 matched control patients 18-49 years of age (younger patients).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rates of peritonitis, exit site and tunnel infection expressed as episodes/patient/year (episodes/year) and the infecting organisms for each were examined. Outcomes, including catheter removal and the cause for removal, transfer to another dialysis modality and the reason for such, death and transplantation were also assessed.

RESULTS

Mean time on peritoneal dialysis was the same in each group (20 +/- 21 months in the older and 18 +/- 17 months in the younger patients). The overall peritonitis rates were the same in the two groups (0.95/year in the older and 0.89/year in the younger patients), but the older patients had a higher rate of S. epidermidis peritonitis (0.28/year vs 0.13/year, p = 0.0001). S. aureus peritonitis rates were similar (0.16/year in older and 0.17/year in younger patients). Older patients had fewer exit-site infections (0.80/year versus 1.2/year, p = 0.0001) and, specifically, lower rates of S. aureus exit-site infections (0.23/year vs 0.47/year, p = 0.0001). Tunnel infections were also less common in older patients (0.15/year vs 0.23/year, p = 0.008), but S. aureus tunnel infection rates were similar (0.05/year and 0.09/year). Catheter infection was the most common reason for catheter removal in both patient groups (35% of catheters in the older and 44% of catheters in the younger patients, p = NS). More catheters were removed form older patients because of dementia or the loss of mechanical skills required to perform peritoneal dialysis exchanges (15% vs 5%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Older age per se is not associated with higher peritonitis rates, but the use of disconnect systems should be encouraged in older patients and their mental and physical skills monitored to avoid S. epidermidis peritonitis. The lower rates of S. aureus catheter infection in older patients requires further study.

摘要

目的

确定老年患者与年轻患者相比,腹膜透析相关感染率是否更高。

设计

对前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析。对照成年患者与老年研究患者在种族、性别、胰岛素依赖情况、连接装置以及透析时间方面进行匹配。

设置

一个以大学为基础的腹膜透析项目,其中包括来自退伍军人管理局医院门诊透析项目的患者。

患者

将103例60岁及以上的患者(老年患者)的感染率与103例年龄在18 - 49岁的匹配对照患者(年轻患者)的感染率进行比较。

主要观察指标

以每患者每年发作次数(发作/年)表示的腹膜炎、出口处及隧道感染率,并检查每种感染的病原体。还评估了包括导管拔除及其原因、转为另一种透析方式及其原因、死亡和移植等结局。

结果

每组患者的腹膜透析平均时间相同(老年患者为20±21个月,年轻患者为18±17个月)。两组的总体腹膜炎发生率相同(老年患者为0.95/年,年轻患者为0.89/年),但老年患者的表皮葡萄球菌腹膜炎发生率更高(0.28/年对0.13/年,p = 0.0001)。金黄色葡萄球菌腹膜炎发生率相似(老年患者为0.16/年,年轻患者为0.17/年)。老年患者的出口处感染较少(0.80/年对1.2/年,p = 0.000!),特别是金黄色葡萄球菌出口处感染率更低(0.23/年对0.47/年,p = 0.0001)。老年患者的隧道感染也较少见(0.15/年对0.23/年,p = 0.008),但金黄色葡萄球菌隧道感染率相似(0.05/年和0.09/年)。导管感染是两组患者导管拔除的最常见原因(老年患者中35%的导管,年轻患者中44%的导管,p = 无显著差异)。由于痴呆或丧失进行腹膜透析交换所需的操作技能,老年患者拔除的导管更多(15%对5%,p = 0.04)。

结论

年龄本身与较高的腹膜炎发生率无关,但应鼓励老年患者使用断开连接系统,并监测他们的心理和身体技能以避免表皮葡萄球菌腹膜炎。老年患者金黄色葡萄球菌导管感染率较低需要进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验