• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么剖宫产要额外付费?

Why pay extra for cesarean-section deliveries?

作者信息

Finkler M D, Wirtschafter D D

机构信息

Lawrence University, Appleton, WI 54912-0599.

出版信息

Inquiry. 1993 Summer;30(2):208-15.

PMID:8314609
Abstract

Third-party insurers typically pay at least 50% more for cesarean sections than for vaginal deliveries, suggesting that a reduced national cesarean-section rate could save payers more than $1 billion annually. This paper discusses the payment implications of a cost-effectiveness study, based on the experience within one health maintenance organization, in which cesarean-section rates were unrelated either to direct costs or to perinatal outcomes. Given these results, insurers should consider paying a flat fee for obstetric services unless differing risk levels or risk-adjusted outcomes justify different amounts.

摘要

第三方保险公司通常为剖宫产支付的费用比顺产至少高出50%,这表明全国剖宫产率的降低每年可为支付方节省超过10亿美元。本文基于一个健康维护组织的经验,讨论了一项成本效益研究的支付影响,在该组织中,剖宫产率与直接成本或围产期结局均无关。鉴于这些结果,除非不同的风险水平或风险调整后的结局证明金额不同是合理的,否则保险公司应考虑为产科服务支付统一费用。

相似文献

1
Why pay extra for cesarean-section deliveries?为什么剖宫产要额外付费?
Inquiry. 1993 Summer;30(2):208-15.
2
One health maintenance organization's experience: obstetric costs depend more on staffing patterns than on mode of delivery.一家健康维护组织的经验:产科成本更多地取决于人员配置模式,而非分娩方式。
J Perinatol. 1997 Mar-Apr;17(2):148-55.
3
Charges for comprehensive obstetric care at teaching and nonteaching hospitals. A comparison.教学医院与非教学医院的综合产科护理收费:一项比较
West J Med. 1991 Dec;155(6):616-20.
4
Relating costs to charges: analyzing 3 labor/delivery services.将成本与收费关联起来:分析三项分娩服务
Hosp Financ Manage. 1979 Nov;33(11):56, 58-61.
5
Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section.阴道分娩与剖宫产选择中的经济激励因素。
Milbank Q. 1993;71(3):365-404.
6
Does a Cesarean section delivery always cost more than a vaginal delivery?剖宫产的费用总是比顺产高吗?
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Feb;13(1):16-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00690.x.
7
Cost-effectiveness and obstetric services.
Med Care. 1991 Oct;29(10):951-63. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199110000-00002.
8
Financial incentives do not always work: an example of cesarean sections in Taiwan.经济激励措施并非总能奏效:以台湾地区剖宫产为例。
Health Policy. 2008 Oct;88(1):121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.02.013. Epub 2008 Apr 23.
9
Births by cesarean: cost changes, 1982-83 to 1986.剖宫产分娩情况:1982 - 1983年至1986年的费用变化
Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 1988 Jul-Sep;69(3):18-25.
10
Labor epidurals improve outcomes for babies of mothers at high risk for unscheduled cesarean section.分娩硬膜外麻醉可改善计划外剖宫产高危产妇所生婴儿的结局。
J Perinatol. 2001 Apr-May;21(3):178-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200519.

引用本文的文献

1
Mind the information gap: fertility rate and use of cesarean delivery and tocolytic hospitalizations in Taiwan.注意信息差距:台湾的生育率和剖宫产率及保胎住院率。
Health Econ Rev. 2011 Dec 12;1(1):20. doi: 10.1186/2191-1991-1-20.
2
The impact of hospital revenue on the increase in Caesarean sections in Norway. A panel data analysis of hospitals 1976-2005.挪威医院收入对剖宫产率增长的影响。1976-2005 年医院的面板数据分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 12;11:267. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-267.
3
Association between type of health insurance and elective cesarean deliveries: New Jersey, 2004-2007.
医疗保险类型与选择性剖宫产术的关联:新泽西州,2004-2007 年。
Am J Public Health. 2011 Nov;101(11):e1-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300333. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
4
Declining fertility and the use of cesarean delivery: evidence from a population-based study in Taiwan.生育率下降和剖宫产术的使用:来自台湾一项基于人群的研究证据。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct;45(5 Pt 1):1360-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01125.x.
5
Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women.低风险女性产科护理中的跨专业差异。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Mar;87(3):344-51. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.3.344.