• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威医院收入对剖宫产率增长的影响。1976-2005 年医院的面板数据分析。

The impact of hospital revenue on the increase in Caesarean sections in Norway. A panel data analysis of hospitals 1976-2005.

机构信息

Department of Community Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 12;11:267. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-267.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-11-267
PMID:21992174
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3210106/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been a marked increase in the number of Caesarean sections in many countries during the last decades. In several countries, Caesarean sections are carried out in more than 20 per cent of births. These high Caesarean section rates give cause for concern, both from an economic and a medical perspective. A general opinion among epidemiologists is that the increase in the number of Caesarean sections during the last decade has been greater than could be expected in relation to medical risk factors. Therefore, other explanations must be sought. We studied one potential explanation; the effect that the increase in hospital revenue per bed during the period 1976-2005 has had on the Caesarean section rate in Norway. During this period, hospital revenue increased by about 260% (adjusted for inflation).

METHODS

The analyses were carried out using data from the Medical Birth Registry 1976-2005 from Norway. The data were merged with data about hospital revenue, which were obtained from Statistics Norway. The analyses were carried out using annual data from 46 hospitals. A fixed effect regression model was estimated. Relevant medical control variables were included.

RESULTS

The elasticity of the Caesarean section rate with respect to hospital revenue per bed was 0.13 (p < 0.05). This represents an increase in the Caesarean section rate from the basis year 1976 to the final year 2005 of about 35 per cent. Most of the variables measuring characteristics of the health status of the mother and child had the expected effects.

CONCLUSION

The increase in hospital revenue explains only a small part of the increase in the Caesarean section rate in Norway during the last three decades. The increase in the Caesarean section rate is considerably greater than could be expected, based on the increase in hospital revenue alone. The strength of our study is that we have estimated a cause and effect relationship. This was done by using fixed effects for hospitals, a lagged revenue variable and by including an extensive set of control variables for the risk factors of the mother and the baby.

摘要

背景

在过去几十年中,许多国家的剖宫产数量显著增加。在一些国家,剖宫产率超过 20%。这些高剖宫产率引起了关注,无论是从经济角度还是医学角度来看。流行病学家的普遍观点是,过去十年中剖宫产数量的增加超过了与医疗风险因素相关的预期。因此,必须寻找其他解释。我们研究了一个潜在的解释;1976 年至 2005 年期间,医院每张床位收入的增加对挪威剖宫产率的影响。在此期间,医院收入增长了约 260%(经通胀调整)。

方法

使用挪威 1976 年至 2005 年的医疗出生登记处的数据进行分析。将数据与从挪威统计局获得的有关医院收入的数据合并。使用来自 46 家医院的年度数据进行分析。估计了固定效应回归模型。纳入了相关的医疗控制变量。

结果

每张床位医院收入的剖宫产率弹性为 0.13(p < 0.05)。这代表从基础年 1976 年到最终年 2005 年,剖宫产率增加了约 35%。大多数衡量母婴健康状况特征的变量都具有预期的效果。

结论

在过去三十年中,医院收入的增加仅解释了挪威剖宫产率增加的一小部分。仅根据医院收入的增加,剖宫产率的增加幅度就大大超过了预期。我们研究的优势在于,我们估计了因果关系。这是通过对医院使用固定效应、滞后的收入变量以及纳入广泛的母婴风险因素控制变量来实现的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf35/3210106/68fad744a5e0/1472-6963-11-267-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf35/3210106/68fad744a5e0/1472-6963-11-267-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf35/3210106/68fad744a5e0/1472-6963-11-267-1.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of hospital revenue on the increase in Caesarean sections in Norway. A panel data analysis of hospitals 1976-2005.挪威医院收入对剖宫产率增长的影响。1976-2005 年医院的面板数据分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Oct 12;11:267. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-267.
2
[Increasing use of cesarean section, even in developing countries].[剖宫产使用率不断上升,即使在发展中国家也是如此]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1996 Jan 10;116(1):67-71.
3
Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section in Jamaica.牙买加剖宫产的患病率及影响因素
J Biosoc Sci. 1992 Oct;24(4):515-25. doi: 10.1017/s0021932000020071.
4
[The epidemic of Caesarean section: has it reached Norway?].[剖宫产流行:它已经蔓延到挪威了吗?]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2003 May 29;123(11):1522-4.
5
Estimation of an expected caesarean section rate taking into account the case mix of a maternity hospital. Analysis from the AUDIPOG Sentinelle Network (France). Obstetricians of AUDIPOG. Association of Users of Computerised Files in Perinatalogy, Obstetrics and Gynaecology.考虑妇产医院病例组合情况对预期剖宫产率的估计。来自AUDIPOG哨兵网络(法国)的分析。AUDIPOG的产科医生。围产医学、产科学与妇科学计算机化档案用户协会
BJOG. 2001 Sep;108(9):919-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00218.x.
6
Analysis of variation in charges and prices paid for vaginal and caesarean section births: a cross-sectional study.阴道分娩和剖宫产分娩收费及支付价格的差异分析:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jan 15;4(1):e004017. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004017.
7
[How much does a caesarean section cost in Madagascar? Socio-economical aspects and caesarean sections rate in Toamasina, Madagascar 1999-2001].[在马达加斯加剖宫产的费用是多少?1999 - 2001年马达加斯加图阿马西纳的社会经济状况及剖宫产率]
Bull Soc Pathol Exot. 2004 Nov;97(4):274-9.
8
[Trends in caesarean section rates and places of delivery in Burkina Faso].[布基纳法索剖宫产率及分娩地点的趋势]
Sante Publique. 2017 Mar 6;29(1):133-139.
9
Caesarean section in nulliparous women of advanced maternal age has been reduced in Sweden and Norway since the 1970s: a register-based study.自 20 世纪 70 年代以来,瑞典和挪威的高龄初产妇剖宫产率有所下降:一项基于登记的研究。
BJOG. 2012 Dec;119(13):1591-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03510.x. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
10
An audit of caesarean section among Saudi females in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯吉达市沙特女性剖宫产情况审计。
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 1994;69(1-2):1-17.

引用本文的文献

1
Office hours and caesarean section: systematic review and Meta-analysis.门诊时间与剖宫产:系统评价与Meta分析
Res Health Serv Reg. 2022 Jun 22;1(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s43999-022-00002-6.
2
Effect of adolescent female fertility and healthcare spending on maternal and neonatal mortality in low resource setting of South Asia.南亚资源匮乏地区青少年女性生育及医疗保健支出对孕产妇和新生儿死亡率的影响。
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Sep 17;12(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00395-7.
3
Evaluation of Hospital Cesarean Delivery-Related Profits and Rates in the United States.

本文引用的文献

1
Do expert patients get better treatment than others? Agency discrimination and statistical discrimination in obstetrics.专家型患者是否比其他患者得到更好的治疗?产科中的机构歧视和统计歧视。
J Health Econ. 2011 Jan;30(1):163-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2010.10.004. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
2
The effect of physicians' remuneration system on the Caesarean section rate: the Uruguayan case.医生薪酬制度对剖宫产率的影响:乌拉圭的案例
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2009 Dec;9(4):333-45. doi: 10.1007/s10754-008-9054-y. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
3
Physician financial incentives and cesarean delivery: new conclusions from the healthcare cost and utilization project.
美国医院剖宫产相关利润和比率的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e212235. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2235.
4
The effectiveness of financial intervention strategies for reducing caesarean section rates: a systematic review.金融干预策略降低剖宫产率的效果:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):1080. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7265-4.
5
Health system factors and caesarean sections in Kosovo: a cross-sectional study.科索沃的卫生系统因素与剖宫产:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 11;9(4):e026702. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026702.
6
Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.美国未参保女性的剖宫产:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 3;9(3):e025356. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025356.
7
Caesarean Section in Peru: Analysis of Trends Using the Robson Classification System.秘鲁的剖宫产:使用罗布森分类系统的趋势分析。
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 3;11(2):e0148138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148138. eCollection 2016.
8
Do caesarean section rates 'catch-up'? Evidence from 14 European countries.剖宫产率“追赶”现象存在吗?来自 14 个欧洲国家的证据。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2013 Dec;16(4):328-40. doi: 10.1007/s10729-013-9232-4. Epub 2013 Mar 22.
9
Birth in Brazil: national survey into labour and birth.巴西分娩:全国劳动与分娩调查。
Reprod Health. 2012 Aug 22;9:15. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-9-15.
10
Adoption of diagnostic technology and variation in caesarean section rates: a test of the practice style hypothesis in Norway.诊断技术的采用与剖宫产率的变化:对挪威实践模式假说的检验。
Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec;47(6):2169-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01419.x. Epub 2012 May 17.
医生的经济激励与剖宫产:医疗成本和利用项目的新结论
J Health Econ. 2009 Jan;28(1):244-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.09.005. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
4
Community factors affecting rising caesarean section rates in developing countries: an analysis of six countries.影响发展中国家剖宫产率上升的社区因素:六个国家的分析
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Oct;67(8):1236-46. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.032. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
5
Lawsuit activity, defensive medicine, and small area variation: the case of Cesarean sections revisited.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2007 Jul;2(Pt 3):285-96. doi: 10.1017/S1744133107004136.
6
Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes.美国的剖宫产:流行病学、趋势及结局
Clin Perinatol. 2008 Jun;35(2):293-307, v. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2008.03.007.
7
Financial incentives do not always work: an example of cesarean sections in Taiwan.经济激励措施并非总能奏效:以台湾地区剖宫产为例。
Health Policy. 2008 Oct;88(1):121-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.02.013. Epub 2008 Apr 23.
8
Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.低风险女性初次剖宫产和阴道分娩的新生儿死亡率:“意向性治疗”模型的应用
Birth. 2008 Mar;35(1):3-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00205.x.
9
Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective caesarean section: cohort study.择期剖宫产分娩足月儿的呼吸道疾病发病风险:队列研究
BMJ. 2008 Jan 12;336(7635):85-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39405.539282.BE. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
10
Cesarean section and maternal education; secular trends in Norway, 1967-2004.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(7):840-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340701417422.