• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二级创伤中心认定是否绝对需要24小时手术室工作人员?

Is 24-hour operating room staff absolutely necessary for level II trauma center designation?

作者信息

Barone J E, Ryan M C, Cayten C G, Murphy J G

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Stamford Hospital, CT 06904.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1993 Jun;34(6):878-82; discussion 882-3. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199306000-00020.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-199306000-00020
PMID:8315684
Abstract

Recent papers from established trauma centers reported average elapsed times from emergency department (ED) admission to the operating room (OR) of greater than 100 minutes for patients judged to be in immediate need of surgery. This study was undertaken to determine whether patients treated at an institution desiring level II trauma center designation in a geographic area with a low incidence of penetrating trauma suffered any adverse effects because of lack of a 24-hour in-house OR staff. Trauma registry data at The Stamford Hospital, a suburban community teaching hospital without OR nursing staff in-house at night, were reviewed and compared with data from three affiliated level I trauma centers and with established national standards using TRISS methodology. Of 659 major trauma patients, 86 (44 blunt, 42 penetrating) underwent surgery within 12 hours of admission. Patients' injuries were similar in severity to those seen at the affiliated trauma centers and to the Major Trauma Outcome Study population. Mortality rates were also similar. No statistically significant differences were seen in elapsed times from ED arrival to OR arrival even in the subgroup of patients with systolic blood pressure values of < or = 90 mm Hg. No unexpected adverse outcomes could be ascribed to the lack of 24-hour OR staffing in this setting. The estimated cost of providing additional OR staffing is $145,000 per year. Since times to the OR and outcomes were similar to those at level I centers, this expense may not be warranted.

摘要

来自老牌创伤中心的近期论文报告称,对于那些被判定急需手术的患者,从急诊科入院到手术室的平均耗时超过100分钟。本研究旨在确定,在一个穿透性创伤发生率较低的地理区域内,一家希望获得二级创伤中心资质的机构所治疗的患者,是否因缺乏24小时的内部手术室工作人员而受到任何不良影响。对斯坦福德医院(一家郊区社区教学医院,夜间没有内部手术室护理人员)的创伤登记数据进行了审查,并使用TRISS方法与三家附属一级创伤中心的数据以及既定的国家标准进行了比较。在659名主要创伤患者中,86名(44名钝器伤,42名穿透伤)在入院后12小时内接受了手术。患者的损伤严重程度与附属创伤中心以及重大创伤结局研究人群中的损伤相似。死亡率也相似。即使在收缩压值≤90毫米汞柱的患者亚组中,从急诊科到达至手术室到达的耗时也没有统计学上的显著差异。在这种情况下,没有意外不良后果可归因于缺乏24小时的手术室人员配备。提供额外手术室人员配备的估计成本为每年14.5万美元。由于到手术室的时间和结局与一级中心相似,这笔费用可能没有必要。

相似文献

1
Is 24-hour operating room staff absolutely necessary for level II trauma center designation?二级创伤中心认定是否绝对需要24小时手术室工作人员?
J Trauma. 1993 Jun;34(6):878-82; discussion 882-3. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199306000-00020.
2
Defining the optimal time to the operating room may salvage early trauma deaths.确定进入手术室的最佳时间可能挽救早期创伤死亡。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 May;76(5):1251-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000218.
3
In-house trauma surgeons do not decrease mortality in a level I trauma center.在一级创伤中心,医院内部的创伤外科医生并不能降低死亡率。
J Trauma. 2002 Sep;53(3):494-500; discussion 500-2. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200209000-00017.
4
Initial management of trauma by a trauma team: effect on timeliness of care in a teaching hospital.创伤团队对创伤的初始处理:对一家教学医院护理及时性的影响
Am J Med Qual. 2000 Jan-Feb;15(1):3-8. doi: 10.1177/106286060001500102.
5
Resuscitative emergency thoracotomy in a Swiss trauma centre.瑞士创伤中心的抢救性紧急开胸术。
Br J Surg. 2012 Apr;99(4):541-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7706. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
6
The presence of in-house attending trauma surgeons does not improve management or outcome of critically injured patients.医院内部创伤外科主治医生的存在并不能改善重伤患者的管理或治疗结果。
J Trauma. 2003 Jul;55(1):20-5. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000071621.39088.7B.
7
Benchmarking the quality-monitoring process: a comparison of outcomes analysis by trauma and injury severity score (TRISS) methodology with the peer-review process.对质量监测过程进行基准测试:采用创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)方法的结果分析与同行评审过程的比较。
J Trauma. 1997 May;42(5):810-5; discussion 815-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199705000-00010.
8
Day for night: should we staff a trauma center like a nightclub?以夜代日:我们是否应该像经营夜总会一样配备创伤中心的人员?
Am Surg. 2002 Dec;68(12):1048-51.
9
Clinical Outcome of Urgent Thoracotomy in Patients with Penetrating and Blunt Chest Trauma: A Retrospective Survey.穿透性和钝性胸部创伤患者紧急开胸手术的临床结果:一项回顾性调查
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Nov;66(8):686-692. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608899. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
10
[Analysis of quality in a first level trauma center in Milan, Italy].[意大利米兰某一级创伤中心的质量分析]
Ann Ital Chir. 2006 Mar-Apr;77(2):97-106.

引用本文的文献

1
The off-hour effect on trauma patients requiring subspecialty intervention at a community hospital in Japan: a retrospective cohort study.日本一家社区医院中,非工作时间对需要专科干预的创伤患者的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Feb 10;23:20. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0095-1.
2
Mortality benefit of transfer to level I versus level II trauma centers for head-injured patients.头部受伤患者转至一级创伤中心与二级创伤中心的死亡率获益情况。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Apr;40(2):435-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00366.x.