Mackey N A, Ilsley A H, Owen H, Plummer J L
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia.
Anesth Analg. 1993 Jul;77(1):117-20.
The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of bolus-demand volumes obtained from the Baxter Patient-Controlled Analgesia Infusor System, a disposable patient-controlled analgesia device. An automated system was used to make demands in a pattern designed to simulate those made by a patient in the first 24 postoperative hours. Following this, a pattern of varying short interdemand intervals was used to evaluate performance of the device when demands were made near the nominal lockout interval of 6 min. Finally, a prolonged array of short interdemand intervals was used to evaluate performance as the reservoir of the devices became exhausted. Ten devices were tested. One device failed; after 70 min of testing the reservoir burst. The mean delivery of the remaining nine devices for the first 24 h of testing was 92.6% of nominal (SD = 3.9%). Evaluation near the nominal lockout interval revealed a departure of delivered volume from nominal (worst = 73.9% at an interdemand interval of 6 min). As the reservoir became exhausted, delivery increased to a maximum value, ranging from 118% to 137% of nominal, before falling to zero. In general, the devices performed consistently and the departures from nominal delivery were not considered to be of clinical significance.
本研究的目的是确定从一次性患者自控镇痛装置百特患者自控镇痛输注系统获得的推注需求量的准确性。使用一个自动化系统按照设计好的模式进行需求设定,该模式旨在模拟患者术后头24小时的需求情况。在此之后,采用短需求间隔变化的模式来评估该装置在需求接近6分钟的标称锁定间隔时的性能。最后,采用一系列长时间的短需求间隔来评估随着装置储液器耗尽时的性能。对10台装置进行了测试。有一台装置出现故障;在测试70分钟后储液器破裂。其余9台装置在测试的头24小时内的平均输注量为标称值的92.6%(标准差=3.9%)。在标称锁定间隔附近进行评估时发现,输注量与标称值存在偏差(在需求间隔为6分钟时,偏差最大为73.9%)。随着储液器耗尽,输注量增加到最大值,范围为标称值的118%至137%,然后降至零。总体而言,这些装置性能一致,与标称输注量的偏差被认为无临床意义。