Terris D J, Fee W E
Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, CA 94305-5328.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993 Jul;119(7):725-31. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1993.01880190021004.
Although accepted surgical techniques for peripheral nerve repair remain largely unchanged over the past three decades, much progress has been made toward understanding the mechanisms involved in nerve regeneration, and consequently toward providing adjunctive measures to enhance this regenerative process. We present a comprehensive review of the significant advances made in several aspects of nerve repair over the past decade, and particularly the past few years, and provide a few examples of facial nerve repair using the standard neurorrhaphy techniques recommended today. Several conclusions were drawn after thorough review of the literature. Early repair of injured nerves is preferred, and there appears to be no benefit to waiting for 3 weeks. Severed nerves should be repaired with monofilament 9-0 nylon suture placed in epineurial fashion. Fibrin glue confers no benefit in reattaching injured nerves. Likewise, theoretical advantages of laser neurorrhaphy have not resulted in improved nerve regeneration. Finally, trophic factors, such as apolipoproteins and nerve growth factor, and tubulization both appear to offer promise for future experimental and clinical progress in nerve repair. However, further work must be done to prove their efficacy.
尽管在过去三十年里,公认的周围神经修复外科技术基本没有变化,但在理解神经再生所涉及的机制方面已经取得了很大进展,因此在提供辅助措施以促进这一再生过程方面也取得了很大进展。我们全面回顾了过去十年,特别是过去几年在神经修复几个方面取得的重大进展,并提供了一些使用当今推荐的标准神经缝合技术进行面神经修复的例子。在对文献进行全面审查后得出了几个结论。受伤神经应尽早修复,等待3周似乎没有益处。切断的神经应用9-0单丝尼龙缝线进行神经外膜缝合修复。纤维蛋白胶在重新连接受伤神经方面没有益处。同样,激光神经缝合术的理论优势并未带来更好的神经再生效果。最后,营养因子,如载脂蛋白和神经生长因子,以及神经导管化似乎都为未来神经修复的实验和临床进展带来了希望。然而,必须进一步开展工作以证明它们的疗效。