Durrant J D, Hyre R
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania.
J Am Acad Audiol. 1993 May;4(3):213-9.
To further elucidate nuances of bone-conduction (BC) stimulation, particularly as they may pertain to BC-elicited auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), real head measurements were made of vibratory responses to BC clicks. A miniature accelerometer was held firmly against the skull near a bone vibrator applied to the mastoid, to the opposite mastoid, and to the forehead. Measurements also were made with the vibrator applied to the forehead and the accelerometer placed on a mastoid. The measured vibrations were compared among conditions within and across subjects. The results demonstrate that vibration picked up in the immediate vicinity of the vibrator, roughly mimics the temporal and spectral characteristics of the click observed on an artificial mastoid. However, probing at sites remote to the bone vibrator suggested the introduction of a propagation-like delay as well as low-pass filtering. These findings support observations of previous researchers who demonstrated phase differences between vibrations recorded at different points on the skull, further demonstrating the complexities of skull vibration. Latency differences of ABR responses obtained with forehead versus mastoid placements, for example, cannot be attributed merely to the difference in efficiency between sites of stimulation demonstrated audiometrically. While the real head observations do not permit determination of the actual vibratory lag at the cochlea, they do permit the deduction that a comparable onset delay occurs in BC as in air-conduction stimulation via supra-aural earphones.
为了进一步阐明骨传导(BC)刺激的细微差别,特别是那些可能与BC诱发的听觉脑干反应(ABR)相关的差别,我们对BC短声的振动反应进行了真实头部测量。一个微型加速度计紧紧贴靠在颅骨上,位置靠近分别置于乳突、对侧乳突和前额的骨振动器。测量时,振动器置于前额,加速度计则放在乳突上。我们对测量得到的振动在不同条件下以及不同受试者之间进行了比较。结果表明,在振动器紧邻区域采集到的振动大致模仿了在人工乳突上观察到的短声的时间和频谱特征。然而,在远离骨振动器的部位进行探测时发现引入了类似传播的延迟以及低通滤波。这些发现支持了先前研究人员的观察结果,他们证明了在颅骨不同点记录的振动之间存在相位差异,进一步证明了颅骨振动的复杂性。例如,在前额与乳突放置方式下获得的ABR反应的潜伏期差异,不能仅仅归因于听力测定所显示的刺激部位之间的效率差异。虽然真实头部观察无法确定耳蜗处实际的振动延迟,但确实可以推断出BC刺激中存在与通过 supra-aural 耳机进行气导刺激时相当的起始延迟。