• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人体易损性上限与除颤阈值之间的关系。

Relation between upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation threshold in humans.

作者信息

Chen P S, Feld G K, Kriett J M, Mower M M, Tarazi R Y, Fleck R P, Swerdlow C D, Gang E S, Kass R M

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048.

出版信息

Circulation. 1993 Jul;88(1):186-92. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.1.186.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.88.1.186
PMID:8319332
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the canine model, an upper limit of shock strength exists that can induce ventricular fibrillation during the vulnerable period of the cardiac cycle. This shock strength (the upper limit of vulnerability) closely correlates with the defibrillation threshold and supports the "upper limit of vulnerability" hypothesis of defibrillation. It is not known whether an upper limit of vulnerability exists in humans or whether this limit correlates with the defibrillation threshold.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 13 patients undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, the shock strengths associated with a 50% probability of reaching the upper limit of vulnerability (ULV50) and a 50% probability of reaching the defibrillation threshold (DFT50) were determined by the up-down algorithm. The ULV50 was determined only for the mid-upslope of the positive T waves and for the mid-downslope of the negative T waves. No major complications occurred during surgery. An upper limit of vulnerability was demonstrated in each patient. The ULV50 was 300 +/- 138 V or 6.8 +/- 5.8 J, which was significantly lower than the DFT50 of 347 +/- 167 V (p = 0.038) or 9.1 +/- 7.3 J (p = 0.013). The correlation between the ULV50 and the DFT50 was significant (r = 0.90, p < 0.001 for voltage; r = 0.93, p < 0.001 for energy).

CONCLUSIONS

An upper limit of vulnerability is present in humans. There is a significant correlation between the ULV50 and the DFT50, and the ULV50 is significantly lower than the DFT50.

摘要

背景

在犬类模型中,存在一个休克强度上限,在心动周期的易损期可诱发心室颤动。这种休克强度(易损性上限)与除颤阈值密切相关,并支持除颤的“易损性上限”假说。目前尚不清楚人类是否存在易损性上限,以及该上限是否与除颤阈值相关。

方法与结果

在13例接受植入式心脏复律除颤器植入的患者中,通过上下算法确定达到易损性上限(ULV50)50%概率和达到除颤阈值(DFT50)50%概率时的休克强度。仅在正向T波的上升支中点和负向T波的下降支中点测定ULV50。手术期间未发生重大并发症。在每位患者中均证实存在易损性上限。ULV50为300±138V或6.8±5.8J,显著低于DFT50的347±167V(p = 0.038)或9.1±7.3J(p = 0.013)。ULV50与DFT50之间的相关性显著(电压方面r = 0.90,p < 0.001;能量方面r = 0.93,p < 0.001)。

结论

人类存在易损性上限。ULV50与DFT50之间存在显著相关性,且ULV50显著低于DFT50。

相似文献

1
Relation between upper limit of vulnerability and defibrillation threshold in humans.人体易损性上限与除颤阈值之间的关系。
Circulation. 1993 Jul;88(1):186-92. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.1.186.
2
Effects of lidocaine on relation between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability in open-chest dogs.利多卡因对开胸犬除颤阈值与易损性上限关系的影响。
Circulation. 1992 Mar;85(3):1146-51. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.85.3.1146.
3
Effects of pacing rate and timing of defibrillation shock on the relation between the defibrillation threshold and the upper limit of vulnerability in open chest dogs.起搏频率和除颤电击时机对开胸犬除颤阈值与易损上限之间关系的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Nov 15;18(6):1555-63. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(91)90690-b.
4
Upper limit of vulnerability is a good estimator of shock strength associated with 90% probability of successful defibrillation in humans with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.易损性上限是经静脉植入式心脏复律除颤器的人类患者中与90%成功除颤概率相关的电击强度的良好估计指标。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Apr;27(5):1112-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00603-6.
5
Inductionless or limited shock testing is possible in most patients with implantable cardioverter- defibrillators/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: results of the multicenter ASSURE Study (Arrhythmia Single Shock Defibrillation Threshold Testing Versus Upper Limit of Vulnerability: Risk Reduction Evaluation With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantations).大多数植入式心脏复律除颤器/心脏再同步治疗除颤器患者可行无诱导或有限电击测试:多中心ASSURE研究(心律失常单次电击除颤阈值测试与易损性上限:植入式心脏复律除颤器植入的风险降低评估)结果
Circulation. 2007 May 8;115(18):2382-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.663112. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
6
Use-dependent effects of lidocaine on the upper limit of vulnerability in open chest dogs.利多卡因对开胸犬易损性上限的使用依赖性效应。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Jun;23(7):1688-92. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90676-9.
7
Relationship between the upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm and the defibrillation threshold in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.植入式心脏复律除颤器患者正常窦性心律下确定的易损性上限与除颤阈值之间的关系。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Apr;21(4 Pt 1):687-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00124.x.
8
Upper limit of vulnerability reliably predicts the defibrillation threshold in humans.易损性上限可可靠地预测人类的除颤阈值。
Circulation. 1994 Nov;90(5):2308-14. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.5.2308.
9
Defibrillation and the upper limit of vulnerability to fibrillation in a transthoracic guinea pig model.经胸豚鼠模型中的除颤与颤动易损性上限
J Electrocardiol. 1999 Apr;32(2):159-66.
10
Correlation of acute and chronic defibrillation threshold with upper limit of vulnerability determined in normal sinus rhythm.正常窦性心律下测定的急性和慢性除颤阈值与易损上限的相关性。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 1999 Jul;3(2):155-61. doi: 10.1023/a:1009825731592.

引用本文的文献

1
R-on-T and the initiation of reentry revisited: Integrating old and new concepts.重新探讨 R-on-T 与折返激动的关系:整合新旧概念。
Heart Rhythm. 2022 Aug;19(8):1369-1383. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.03.1224. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
2
New insights into defibrillation of the heart from realistic simulation studies.从现实模拟研究中对心脏除颤的新认识。
Europace. 2014 May;16(5):705-13. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut330.
3
Mechanisms of defibrillation.除颤机制。
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2010 Aug 15;12:233-58. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-070909-105305.
4
High defibrillation threshold: the science, signs and solutions.高除颤阈值:科学、体征与解决方案。
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2010 Jan 7;10(1):21-39.
5
Upper limit of vulnerability and heterogeneity.易损性和异质性的上限
Heart Rhythm. 2009 Mar;6(3):368-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.11.032. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
6
Chronaxie of defibrillation: a pathway toward further optimization of defibrillation waveform?除颤的时值:通往进一步优化除颤波形的途径?
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Mar;20(3):315-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01330.x. Epub 2008 Oct 14.
7
The role of mechanoelectric feedback in vulnerability to electric shock.机械电反馈在电击易感性中的作用。
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2008 Jun-Jul;97(2-3):461-78. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2008.02.020. Epub 2008 Feb 16.
8
Role of atrial fibrillation threshold evaluation on guiding treatment.心房颤动阈值评估在指导治疗中的作用。
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2003 Oct 1;3(4):224-30.
9
Differences between left and right ventricular chamber geometry affect cardiac vulnerability to electric shocks.左心室和右心室腔几何结构的差异会影响心脏对电击的易损性。
Circ Res. 2005 Jul 22;97(2):168-75. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000174429.00987.17. Epub 2005 Jun 23.
10
Successful implantation of cardiac defibrillators without induction of ventricular fibrillation using upper limit of vulnerability testing.使用易损性上限测试成功植入心脏除颤器且未诱发心室颤动。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003 Feb;8(1):71-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1022304417889.