Suppr超能文献

双能X线吸收法与皮褶厚度测量法在评估肾移植受者全身脂肪中的比较

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry versus skinfold measurements in the assessment of total body fat in renal transplant recipients.

作者信息

Hart P D, Wilkie M E, Edwards A, Cunningham J

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Royal London Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Nutr. 1993 May;47(5):347-52.

PMID:8319670
Abstract

Traditional methods for estimating total body fat rely on the assumption that body fat distribution and bone mineral content are constant. However, in patients undergoing renal transplantation rapid changes in body composition occur, with variations in fat distribution and bone mineral content. In order to determine the reliability of skinfold measurement (SFM) in these patients, we compared it with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), which estimates body composition without reliance on assumptions of constant fat distribution and bone mineral content. Thirty-four adult renal transplant recipients were studied at the time of transplantation and again after 3 and 6 months. The correlation coefficients of DEXA vs SFM at the three time points were 0.84, 0.78, 0.85, respectively (P = 0.0001). In 34 healthy adults serving as controls, the correlation coefficient was 0.95 (P = 0.0001). Total body fat increased progressively following renal transplantation (P < 0.03 by 6 months) with SFM showing considerable disagreement with DEXA measurements of percentage total body fat. Thus skinfold measurements underestimated changes in total body fat following renal transplantation, especially in those gaining substantial amounts of body fat, and DEXA appeared to be a more appropriate technique.

摘要

传统的估计全身脂肪的方法依赖于身体脂肪分布和骨矿物质含量恒定的假设。然而,肾移植患者的身体成分会迅速发生变化,脂肪分布和骨矿物质含量也会有所不同。为了确定皮褶厚度测量(SFM)在这些患者中的可靠性,我们将其与双能X线吸收法(DEXA)进行了比较,DEXA在估计身体成分时不依赖于脂肪分布和骨矿物质含量恒定的假设。对34名成年肾移植受者在移植时以及移植后3个月和6个月再次进行了研究。三个时间点DEXA与SFM的相关系数分别为0.84、0.78、0.85(P = 0.0001)。在作为对照的34名健康成年人中,相关系数为0.95(P = 0.0001)。肾移植后全身脂肪逐渐增加(6个月时P < 0.03),SFM显示与DEXA测量的全身脂肪百分比存在相当大的差异。因此,皮褶厚度测量低估了肾移植后全身脂肪的变化,尤其是在那些体重增加较多的患者中,DEXA似乎是一种更合适的技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验