Brown J C, Niinikoski J, Duke L W
Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Birmingham 35294.
Exp Aging Res. 1993 Apr-Jun;19(2):147-64. doi: 10.1080/03610739308253928.
In Experiment 1, young and old adults both generated and read the same words either two, five, or eight times (with frequencies combined orthogonally) and then judged the frequency of either the generated or read words. In Experiment 2, young and old adults generated and read different words either one, two, or three times and judged the frequency of both the generated and read words. In both experiments, generation, compared to reading, increased the slope of frequency judgments comparably for the two age groups. In Experiment 1, neither age group could discriminate read from generated frequency. In Experiment 2, a 24-h retention interval reduced the slope of frequency judgments, but did not interact with either age or generation efforts. These results seem most consistent with a semantic activation explanation of the generation effect and a familiarity-based judgment about frequency of occurrence.
在实验1中,年轻和年长的成年人将相同的单词生成并阅读2次、5次或8次(频率以正交方式组合),然后判断所生成或阅读单词的频率。在实验2中,年轻和年长的成年人将不同的单词生成并阅读1次、2次或3次,并判断所生成和阅读单词的频率。在两个实验中,与阅读相比,生成使两个年龄组的频率判断斜率同等增加。在实验1中,两个年龄组都无法区分阅读频率和生成频率。在实验2中,24小时的保留间隔降低了频率判断的斜率,但与年龄或生成努力均无交互作用。这些结果似乎最符合对生成效应的语义激活解释以及基于熟悉度的出现频率判断。