Suppr超能文献

血液透析期间通过连续血容量监测对“再充盈类型”的特征分析

Characterization of "refilling types" by continuous blood volume monitoring during hemodialysis.

作者信息

Röckel A, Abdelhamid S, Fiegel P, Menth M, Walb D, Schneditz D

机构信息

Gemeinschaftspraxis Nephrologie, Wiesbaden, Germany.

出版信息

Kidney Int Suppl. 1993 Jun;41:S67-9.

PMID:8320948
Abstract

Fluid removal during HD is frequently associated with acute hypotension due to insufficient mobilization of extravascular fluid and subsequent hypovolemia. Large variability in vascular refilling makes dialysis therapy difficult and requires a better understanding of fluid distribution in the individual hemodialysis (HD) patient. Blood volume monitoring was performed by continuous measurement of blood density with a DMA 46 Density Meter (Fa. Chempro, PAAR, Austria) in six patients on regular HD treatment. A body filtration coefficient (CF = extra/intravascular fluid shift) was calculated using a computer model by Schneditz et al (1990) and blood density was measured during a 60-minute ultrafiltration period (1/3 x delta kg/hr = 19 +/- 4 ml/min). Concerning blood density differences (delta f%) and body filtration coefficient (CF) there was a wide inter-individual range (delta f = 2.8-8.0%, CF = 3-9 ml/mm Hg/min), but there was a good intraindividual reproducibility of delta f and CF. A negative correlation (r = -0.95) between delta f and CF could be established. The severity of hypotensive episodes and frequency of interventions correlated well with delta f and CF; severe symptoms occurred with a delta f > 6% and a CF < 4 ml/mm Hg/min. These results suggest that improvement in dialysis therapy can be achieved by blood volume monitoring and classification of "refilling types." By blood volume-controlled computerized sodium and UF profiles, a reduction of hypotensive episodes and emergency intervention might be possible.

摘要

血液透析(HD)过程中的液体清除常常与急性低血压相关,这是由于血管外液体动员不足及随后的血容量减少所致。血管再充盈的巨大变异性使得透析治疗变得困难,需要更好地了解个体血液透析(HD)患者的液体分布情况。使用DMA 46密度计(奥地利PAAR公司Chempro生产)连续测量血液密度,对6例接受常规HD治疗的患者进行血容量监测。采用Schneditz等人(1990年)的计算机模型计算体滤过系数(CF = 血管外/血管内液体转移),并在60分钟的超滤期(1/3×每小时体重下降千克数 = 19±4毫升/分钟)测量血液密度。关于血液密度差异(δf%)和体滤过系数(CF),个体间范围较宽(δf = 2.8 - 8.0%,CF = 3 - 9毫升/毫米汞柱/分钟),但δf和CF在个体内具有良好的可重复性。δf与CF之间可建立负相关(r = -0.95)。低血压发作的严重程度和干预频率与δf和CF密切相关;当δf>6%且CF<4毫升/毫米汞柱/分钟时会出现严重症状。这些结果表明,通过血容量监测和“再充盈类型”分类可改善透析治疗。通过血容量控制的计算机化钠和超滤曲线,可能减少低血压发作和紧急干预。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验