De Santis M V, Haude R H
University of Akron, OH 44325-4301.
Percept Mot Skills. 1993 Jun;76(3 Pt 1):719-22. doi: 10.2466/pms.1993.76.3.719.
66 subjects characterized as either good or poor visualizers were presented ambiguous pictorial stimuli accompanied by either a verbal interpretation or no interpretation. Both recall and recognition measures for the stimuli were obtained. Good visualizers showed superior recall and recognition compared with poor visualizers in the absence of verbal interpretation. Good and poor visualizers did not differ on either measure of memory when an interpretation accompanied the stimuli. Good visualizers performed equally well either with or without an interpretation, while poor visualizers performed significantly better with an interpretation.
66名被归类为视觉能力强或弱的受试者观看了模糊的图片刺激，同时伴有言语解释或无解释。对这些刺激的回忆和识别指标均被获取。在没有言语解释的情况下，视觉能力强的受试者在回忆和识别方面表现优于视觉能力弱的受试者。当刺激伴有解释时，视觉能力强和弱的受试者在任何一项记忆指标上都没有差异。视觉能力强的受试者无论有无解释表现都同样出色，而视觉能力弱的受试者在有解释时表现明显更好。
