Melchor R, Biddiscombe M F, Mak V H, Short M D, Spiro S G
Department of Thoracic Medicine, University College Hospital, London.
Thorax. 1993 May;48(5):506-11. doi: 10.1136/thx.48.5.506.
BACKGROUND--Earlier studies of aerosol deposition in the lungs have relied on indirect labelling of Teflon spheres of a similar size distribution to the drug in question and have assumed similar aerodynamic properties. Using a modification of a new technique for directly labelling salbutamol, the deposition of salbutamol within the lungs of normal subjects and patients with asthma has been studied with the use of a metered dose inhaler (MDI) alone, an MDI with a spacer device, and a dry powder inhaler (DPI). METHOD--Salbutamol was directly labelled with technetium-99m and placed in an MDI or DPI. Ten normal subjects and 19 patients with asthma inhaled 200 micrograms of salbutamol by means of the MDI alone, the MDI with a spacer device attached, and by DPI on separate days. Deposition was assessed by a dual headed gamma camera after inhalation of the drug. RESULTS--The total mean (SD) percentage deposition of the drug in the normal subjects was 21.6% (8.9%) with the MDI alone, 20.9% (7.8%) with the MDI with spacer, and 12.4% (3.5%) with the DPI. For the patients, the mean percentage deposition was 18.2% (7.8%) with the MDI alone, 19.0% (8.9%) with the MDI and spacer, and 11.4% (5.0%) with the DPI. Bronchodilatation achieved by the patients was similar with all three techniques. Mean peripheral lung deposition was significantly greater with a spacer device than when the MDI was used alone in both normal subjects (49.4% (6.1%) v 44.1% (9.9%)) and patients (38.6% (11.1%) v 30.4% (9.4%)). CONCLUSIONS--The deposition of directly labelled salbutamol from an MDI is greater than previously estimated by indirect labelling techniques. The deposition of labelled salbutamol from a DPI, however, is little different from that measured by indirect techniques.
背景——早期关于肺部气溶胶沉积的研究依赖于对与所研究药物具有相似粒径分布的聚四氟乙烯球体进行间接标记,并假定其具有相似的空气动力学特性。通过对一种直接标记沙丁胺醇的新技术进行改进,研究了单独使用定量吸入器(MDI)、带储雾罐的MDI以及干粉吸入器(DPI)时,正常受试者和哮喘患者肺部沙丁胺醇的沉积情况。方法——用锝-99m直接标记沙丁胺醇,并将其置于MDI或DPI中。10名正常受试者和19名哮喘患者在不同日期分别通过单独使用MDI、带储雾罐的MDI以及DPI吸入200微克沙丁胺醇。吸入药物后,用双头γ相机评估沉积情况。结果——在正常受试者中,单独使用MDI时药物的总平均(标准差)沉积百分比为21.6%(8.9%),使用带储雾罐的MDI时为20.9%(7.8%),使用DPI时为12.4%(3.5%)。对于患者,单独使用MDI时平均沉积百分比为18.2%(7.8%),使用MDI和储雾罐时为19.0%(8.9%),使用DPI时为11.4%(5.0%)。患者通过这三种技术实现的支气管扩张效果相似。在正常受试者(49.4%(6.1%)对44.1%(9.9%))和患者(38.6%(11.1%)对30.4%(9.4%))中,使用储雾罐时外周肺的平均沉积明显高于单独使用MDI时。结论——来自MDI的直接标记沙丁胺醇的沉积大于先前通过间接标记技术估计的沉积量。然而,来自DPI的标记沙丁胺醇的沉积与通过间接技术测量的沉积量几乎没有差异。