Rapidis A D, Langdon J D, Patel M F, Harvey P W
Cancer. 1977 Jan;39(1):204-9. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197701)39:1<204::aid-cncr2820390132>3.0.co;2-9.
A new system for the notation of intra-oral carcinomata has been described. It differs from all previous TNM classifications in that both the site (S) and the pathology (P) have been taken into consideration in addition to the conventional tumour (T), node (N) and metastasis (M) generally used. Both of these additional features have been recognized as important factors in assessing the prognosis of the patient. This new system additionally functions as a means of disseminating the maximum of clinical information succinctly and in a readily communicable format. A further innovation has been the introduction of a means of quantitatively assessing the significance of particular clinical and pathological features and from these values predicting the prognosis. For comparative purposes we have defined four stages corresponding with the stages used in the conventional TNM classification. We have applied the STNMP classification to a random sample of 136 cases of intra-oral carcinomata with more than 5 years follow-up. Particularly in defining those patients with a good prognosis, i.e. 5 year plus survival, this system has proved to be considerably more accurate than the existing staging methods. We propose that for a trial period this system should be widely used in parallel with the conventional TNM classification and staging in order to evaluate its true worth in the clinical situation. With further use it will probably be necessary to adjust the numerical weighting given to particular features, but this can only be accurately assessed when a very large number of patients has been evaluated. Our figures support the clinical impression that patients with poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinomata have a shorter survival than those with well differentiated lesions and that the degree of differentiation of the tumour is directly proportional to the survival of the patient. When considering the site of the tumour we have based our grading on the known survival curves for squamous cell carcinomata at different sites.
已描述了一种用于口腔癌标注的新系统。它与以往所有的TNM分类不同,除了通常使用的传统肿瘤(T)、淋巴结(N)和转移(M)外,还考虑了部位(S)和病理(P)。这两个额外的特征均被认为是评估患者预后的重要因素。这个新系统还能以简洁且易于交流的格式最大限度地传播临床信息。另一项创新是引入了一种定量评估特定临床和病理特征重要性的方法,并根据这些值预测预后。为了进行比较,我们定义了与传统TNM分类中使用的阶段相对应的四个阶段。我们将STNMP分类应用于136例口腔癌随机样本,这些病例均有超过5年的随访。特别是在定义那些预后良好(即生存5年以上)的患者时,该系统已证明比现有的分期方法准确得多。我们建议在试验期内,该系统应与传统的TNM分类和分期并行广泛使用,以评估其在临床情况下的真正价值。随着进一步应用,可能有必要调整赋予特定特征的数值权重,但只有在评估了大量患者后才能准确评估这一点。我们的数据支持临床印象,即低分化鳞状细胞癌患者的生存期比高分化病变患者短,且肿瘤的分化程度与患者的生存期成正比。在考虑肿瘤部位时,我们根据不同部位鳞状细胞癌已知的生存曲线进行分级。