Suppr超能文献

Comparison of bolus and infusion protocols for determining acute insulin response to intravenous glucose in normal humans. The ICARUS Group. Islet Cell Antibody Register User's Study.

作者信息

McCulloch D K, Bingley P J, Colman P G, Jackson R A, Gale E A

机构信息

Diabetes Clinical Research Unit, Virginia Mason Research Center, Seattle, WA 98101.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 1993 Jun;16(6):911-5. doi: 10.2337/diacare.16.6.911.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To help standardize methodology for intravenous glucose tolerance testing in preclinical IDDM by comparing a 30-s bolus and a 3-min infusion of glucose.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We tested 20 healthy nondiabetic adults at four centers (in Seattle, Boston, Melbourne, and London). Each subject had four intravenous glucose tolerance tests (two bolus and two infusion). The acute insulin response to glucose was calculated as the mean of the 1' + 3', the mean of 1' to 10', or as the integrated area from 0 to 10'. Glucose and insulin profiles and intrasubject coefficient of variation were compared.

RESULTS

With the infusion protocol, the 1' insulin was significantly higher, resulting in a higher acute insulin response to glucose when calculated as 1' + 3' (525 +/- 66 vs. 376 +/- 35 pM, P < 0.004). When calculated over 10 min, however, the acute insulin response to glucose was not different between protocols. In addition, the intrasubject coefficient of variation was significantly better when calculated over 10 min in both protocols, but no significant differences were noted between the bolus and infusion (infusion: AIRg [area from 0 to 10'] 10.4 +/- 2.1% vs. AIRg [1' + 3'] 14.9 +/- 2.8%, P < 0.007; bolus: AIRg [area from 0 to 10'] 14.6 +/- 2.8% vs. AIRg [1' + 3'] 19.8 +/- 3.5%, P < 0.007). Comparison of the insulin assays between the four centers showed close correlation and gave indistinguishable results in terms of within-subject coefficient of variation. Glucose profiles were similar in both protocols. Although the glucose values were lower with the bolus protocol from 4' to 40', the rate of fall from 10 to 30' (and thus the rate of glucose disposal) was indistinguishable between the two.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that neither protocol gives significant advantage over the other. However, to allow comparison of the acute insulin response to glucose between different protocols used in centers around the world, the ICARUS 3-min infusion protocol is recommended, with acute insulin response to glucose calculated over 10 min after the end of glucose administration; this reduces the within-subject coefficient of variation and provides similar acute insulin response to glucose with both protocols.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验