Chancellor A M, Swingler R J, Fraser H, Clarke J A, Warlow C P
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Apr;47(2):116-20. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.2.116.
To determine the accuracy of (1) hospital discharge data and (2) death certificates, coded as motor neuron disease (MND).
Comparison of data from The Scottish Motor Neuron Disease Register (SMNDR) with routinely collected Scottish Hospital In-Patient Statistics (SHIPS) and death certificate coding.
Scotland UK.
The sensitivity and positive predictive value of a diagnosis of MND as retrieved by (1) the Information and Statistics Division of the Common Services Agency for the Scottish Health Service for morbidity data and (2) the Registrar General's office for mortality data, using the SMNDR as the 'gold standard'.
(1) Thirty per cent of adult patients identified as having MND by SHIPS did not have this disease and 23% of patients with MND did not appear on SHIPS. The sensitivity of a diagnosis of MND, as retrieved by SHIPS, was 84% and the positive predictive value was 70% overall. Miscoding of patients with pseudobulbar palsy caused by cerebrovascular disease was the major source of false positive error. The incidence of adult onset sporadic MND was over estimated by SHIPS by a factor of 1.6. (2) Mortality data were more accurate, with a false negative rate of 6% and a positive predictive value of 90%.
Coded hospital discharge data are an inaccurate record of a diagnosis of MND and cannot, in their present form, be used as a reliable measure of disease incidence in Scotland. Greater care is required in the preparation of discharge summaries and coding if these data are to be useful for health care planning and epidemiological research. SHIPS is, however, an important source of information to achieve a complete sample of patients with MND. There is also a problematic false positive rate for mortality data but this source more closely approximates true incidence.
确定(1)医院出院数据以及(2)编码为运动神经元病(MND)的死亡证明的准确性。
将苏格兰运动神经元病登记册(SMNDR)的数据与常规收集的苏格兰医院住院患者统计数据(SHIPS)以及死亡证明编码进行比较。
英国苏格兰。
(1)1989 - 1990年首次从苏格兰医院出院的379名成年人(>15岁),以及(2)同期被分配到国际疾病分类(ICD)-9第335类(MND)的281例死亡病例。
以SMNDR作为“金标准”,由(1)苏格兰卫生服务公共服务局信息与统计部门获取的发病率数据以及(2)总登记官办公室获取的死亡率数据中,MND诊断的敏感性和阳性预测值。
(1)被SHIPS确定为患有MND的成年患者中,30%实际上并未患有该疾病,而患有MND的患者中有23%未出现在SHIPS中。SHIPS检索到的MND诊断敏感性为84%,总体阳性预测值为70%。由脑血管疾病导致的假性延髓麻痹患者的错误编码是假阳性错误的主要来源。SHIPS将成人起病的散发性MND发病率高估了1.6倍。(2)死亡率数据更准确,假阴性率为6%,阳性预测值为90%。
编码后的医院出院数据对于MND诊断的记录不准确,以其目前的形式,不能用作苏格兰疾病发病率的可靠衡量指标。如果这些数据要用于医疗保健规划和流行病学研究,在准备出院小结和编码时需要更加谨慎。然而,SHIPS是获取MND患者完整样本的重要信息来源。死亡率数据也存在问题性的假阳性率,但该来源更接近真实发病率。