• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cost effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for medium-sized kidney stones: a randomised clinical trial.

作者信息

Menon M

出版信息

J Urol. 1993 Aug;150(2 Pt 1):565.

PMID:8326600
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Cost effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for medium-sized kidney stones: a randomised clinical trial.
J Urol. 1993 Aug;150(2 Pt 1):565.
2
Cost-effectiveness of different treatment options for staghorn calculi.鹿角形结石不同治疗方案的成本效益
J Urol. 1996 Nov;156(5):1567-71.
3
A cost-effectiveness analysis of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1989;122:44-51.
4
Cost effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for medium-sized kidney stones. A randomised clinical trial.体外冲击波碎石术和经皮肾镜取石术治疗中等大小肾结石的成本效益。一项随机临床试验。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1992;26(3):257-63. doi: 10.3109/00365599209180879.
5
[Current aspects of stone therapy].[结石治疗的当前进展]
Aktuelle Urol. 2005 Feb;36(1):47-54. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-830192.
6
Economic outcomes of treatment for ureteral and renal stones: a systematic literature review.治疗输尿管和肾结石的经济结果：系统文献回顾。
J Urol. 2012 Aug;188(2):449-54. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.008. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
7
Treatment of renal stones in children: a comparison between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and shock wave lithotripsy.儿童肾结石的治疗：经皮肾镜取石术与冲击波碎石术的比较
J Urol. 2006 Aug;176(2):706-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.080.
8
Contribution of modern lithotripsy to the practice of urology.
Isr J Med Sci. 1986 Mar-Apr;22(3-4):237-40.
9
A comparison of anatrophic nephrolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy with and without extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for management of patients with staghorn calculi.无萎缩性肾切开取石术与经皮肾镜取石术（联合或不联合体外冲击波碎石术）治疗鹿角形结石患者的比较
J Urol. 1991 Apr;145(4):710-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38431-8.
10
Monotherapy of staghorn renal calculi: a comparative study between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.鹿角形肾结石的单一疗法：经皮肾镜取石术与体外冲击波碎石术的比较研究
J Urol. 1988 May;139(5):895-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42709-1.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness and safety of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the management of kidney stones: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的有效性和安全性：一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(19):e19915. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019915.
2
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus shock wave lithotripsy for high-density moderate-sized renal stones: A prospective randomized study.经皮肾镜取石术与冲击波碎石术治疗高密度中等大小肾结石的前瞻性随机研究
Urol Ann. 2019 Oct-Dec;11(4):426-431. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_63_19.