• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理教育中的伦理、能动性与赋权

Ethics, agency and empowerment in nurse education.

作者信息

Wilmot S

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 1993 Jun;13(3):189-95. doi: 10.1016/0260-6917(93)90101-7.

DOI:10.1016/0260-6917(93)90101-7
PMID:8326940
Abstract

The ethical demands of professional nursing practice are considered, and the concept of Agency is offered as a potentially useful part of the nurses conceptual equipment for such practice. The pressures of working in large organisations are suggested to be inimical to a sense of Agency, and it is also suggested that some of the academic disciplines involved in nurse education are offering an ambiguous view of the issue of Agency. The discipline of Ethics, while also ambiguous on this issue, is presented as offering useful ways of exploring that ambiguity. Several theories of Ethics are considered in relation to human freedom and responsibility, and the issue between determinism and free will is likewise considered. It is suggested that these offer ways of helping the individual to explore and develop their own stance on freedom and responsibility, and thereby on the issue of Agency. This discussion is related to the United Kingdom Central Council (UKCC) Code of Professional Conduct, and the paradox of choice is acknowledged.

摘要

文中考虑了专业护理实践的伦理要求,并提出“能动性”这一概念,作为护士从事此类实践时概念工具中潜在有用的一部分。文中指出,在大型组织中工作的压力不利于能动性的形成,还提到一些参与护士教育的学术学科对能动性问题的看法模棱两可。伦理学学科虽然在这个问题上也不明确,但被认为提供了探索这种模糊性的有用方法。文中探讨了几种与人类自由和责任相关的伦理学理论,同时也思考了决定论和自由意志之间的问题。文中认为,这些理论有助于个人探索和发展自己在自由和责任问题上的立场,进而在能动性问题上形成自己的立场。这一讨论与英国中央理事会(UKCC)的《职业行为准则》相关,并承认了选择的悖论。

相似文献

1
Ethics, agency and empowerment in nurse education.护理教育中的伦理、能动性与赋权
Nurse Educ Today. 1993 Jun;13(3):189-95. doi: 10.1016/0260-6917(93)90101-7.
2
Professional codes: an exercise in tokenism?专业准则:一种形式主义的做法?
Nurs Ethics. 1994 Mar;1(1):15-23. doi: 10.1177/096973309400100103.
3
Nursing ethics and codes of professional conduct.护理伦理与职业行为准则。
Nurs Ethics. 1996 Sep;3(3):250-8. doi: 10.1177/096973309600300307.
4
Is the professional code still the cornerstone of clinical nursing practice?专业规范仍是临床护理实践的基石吗?
J Adv Nurs. 1996 Jan;23(1):25-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb03131.x.
5
The American Nurses Association Code of Ethics: a reflection on the ethics of respect and human dignity with nurse as expert.美国护士协会伦理守则:以护士为专家对尊重伦理和人类尊严的思考
Nurs Sci Q. 2003 Oct;16(4):301-4. doi: 10.1177/0894318403257027.
6
Empowerment through use of the Code of Professional Conduct.通过使用《职业行为准则》实现赋权。
Br J Nurs. 1994;3(12):631-4. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1994.3.12.631.
7
Are nursing codes of practice ethical?护理执业规范是否合乎道德?
Nurs Ethics. 2001 Jan;8(1):5-18. doi: 10.1177/096973300100800103.
8
Academic freedom, analysis, and the Code of Professional Conduct.
Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Nov;24(8):615-21. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2004.07.014.
9
Professional values and norms for nurses in Belgium.比利时护士的职业价值观与规范
Nurs Ethics. 2003 Nov;10(6):654-65. doi: 10.1191/0969733003ne654oa.
10
The UKCC code of conduct.
Nursing (Lond). 1987 Feb;3(14):510-1.