• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

苏联的疾病概念与精神病学的滥用

Concepts of disease and the abuse of psychiatry in the USSR.

作者信息

Fulford K W, Smirnov A Y, Snow E

机构信息

University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford.

出版信息

Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Jun;162:801-10. doi: 10.1192/bjp.162.6.801.

DOI:10.1192/bjp.162.6.801
PMID:8330112
Abstract

There is a strong prima facie case linking the abuse of psychiatry with difficulties about the concept of mental illness. However, a survey of recent Soviet literature showed that the concept of disease employed in the former USSR (where abuse was for a time widespread) was similar to its counterparts in the UK and USA in being strongly scientific in nature. A number of factors--legal, bureaucratic and professional--are important in abuse becoming widespread. These, however, fail to explain why psychiatry, rather than physical medicine, should be vulnerable to abuse. It is here that the concept of disease could be important. A scientific model of disease suggests that a significant vulnerability factor is the relatively underdeveloped status of psychiatry as a science. This leaves room for poor standards of scientific work in clinical research and practice, factors which are recognised as important in the Soviet case. In addition to the scientific element, there is an evaluative element of meaning in the concept of disease. Hence a second vulnerability factor could be the evaluatively problematic nature of judgements of mental illness. It is concluded that a failure to recognise this factor greatly increases the vulnerability of psychiatry, not only to gross abuses, but also to inadvertent misuses of involuntary treatment in everyday practice. This conclusion, far from undermining the role of science in psychiatry, is a step towards clarifying its proper role.

摘要

有一个强有力的初步证据表明,精神病学的滥用与精神疾病概念方面的难题存在关联。然而,一项对近期苏联文献的调查显示,前苏联(精神病学滥用曾一度普遍存在)所采用的疾病概念,在本质上与英国和美国的同类概念一样,具有很强的科学性。在滥用行为变得普遍的过程中,一些因素——法律、官僚和专业方面的因素——很重要。然而,这些因素无法解释为什么精神病学而非物理医学容易受到滥用。在这方面,疾病概念可能很重要。一种科学的疾病模型表明,一个重要的脆弱性因素是精神病学作为一门科学相对不发达的状态。这就为临床研究和实践中科学工作的低标准留下了空间,这些因素在苏联的案例中被认为是重要的。除了科学因素外,疾病概念中还有一个意义的评价性因素。因此,第二个脆弱性因素可能是精神疾病判断在评价上存在问题的性质。得出的结论是,未能认识到这一因素会极大地增加精神病学的脆弱性,不仅容易遭受严重滥用,而且在日常实践中也容易无意地滥用非自愿治疗。这一结论远非削弱科学在精神病学中的作用,而是朝着阐明其恰当作用迈出的一步。

相似文献

1
Concepts of disease and the abuse of psychiatry in the USSR.苏联的疾病概念与精神病学的滥用
Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Jun;162:801-10. doi: 10.1192/bjp.162.6.801.
2
Concepts of illness and disease.疾病的概念
Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Sep;163:418. doi: 10.1192/bjp.163.3.418a.
3
Lessons from history: the politics of psychiatry in the USSR.历史的教训:苏联的精神病学政治
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2000 Aug;7(4):355-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2850.2000.00297.x.
4
Psychiatry and the polity: the Soviet case and some general implications.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1977 Mar 18;285:687-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb29391.x.
5
Psychiatric diagnosis, psychiatric power and psychiatric abuse.精神科诊断、精神科权力与精神科虐待。
J Med Ethics. 1994 Sep;20(3):135-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.3.135.
6
Sociological issues in the conceptualization of mental illness.精神疾病概念化中的社会学问题。
J Adv Nurs. 1991 Dec;16(12):1470-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1991.tb01595.x.
7
Psychiatry is more than a science.精神病学不止是一门科学。
Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Jun;162:843-4. doi: 10.1192/bjp.162.6.843.
8
Psychiatry is more than a science.精神病学不仅仅是一门科学。
Br J Psychiatry. 1993 Jun;162:844. doi: 10.1192/bjp.162.6.844a.
9
Mental health attitudes and practices of Soviet immigrants.苏联移民的心理健康态度与行为
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 1990;27(3):131-44.
10
[Actual ethical problems of present-day psychiatry].
Sov Zdravookhr. 1991(8):41-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Community treatment orders: the experiences of Non-Maori and Maori within mainstream and Maori mental health services.社区治疗令:主流和毛利精神健康服务中,非毛利族裔和毛利族裔的经历。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Feb;49(2):267-73. doi: 10.1007/s00127-013-0734-7. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
2
Looking with both eyes open: fact and value in psychiatric diagnosis?双眼睁开看:精神病学诊断中的事实与价值?
World Psychiatry. 2005 Jun;4(2):78-86.
3
What can philosophy do for psychiatry?哲学能为精神病学做些什么?
World Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;3(3):130-5.
4
Bioethical blind spots: four flaws in the field of view of traditional bioethics.生物伦理盲点:传统生物伦理视野中的四个缺陷
Health Care Anal. 1993 Nov;1(2):155-62. doi: 10.1007/BF02197110.
5
Praxis makes perfect: illness as a bridge between biological concepts of disease and social conceptions of health.熟能生巧:疾病作为生物学疾病概念与社会健康观念之间的桥梁。
Theor Med. 1993 Dec;14(4):305-20. doi: 10.1007/BF00996338.
6
Psychiatric diagnosis, psychiatric power and psychiatric abuse.精神科诊断、精神科权力与精神科虐待。
J Med Ethics. 1994 Sep;20(3):135-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.3.135.