Suppr超能文献

结直肠吻合口引流的随机试验

Randomized trial of drainage of colorectal anastomosis.

作者信息

Sagar P M, Couse N, Kerin M, May J, MacFie J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Scarborough Hospital, North Yorkshire, UK.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1993 Jun;80(6):769-71. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800800640.

Abstract

A prospective randomized trial was carried out to determine whether use of a high-pressure closed-suction intraperitoneal drain was associated with a reduction in morbidity rate after colorectal resection and to examine the influence of drainage on postoperative fluid collections. A consecutive series of 148 patients who underwent colonic or colorectal resection were randomized to receive no drain (n = 51) or a high-pressure closed-suction drain for either 3 (n = 47) or 7 (n = 47) days. Three patients were excluded. All patients underwent abdominal ultrasonography on days 3 and 7 and those undergoing left-sided colorectal resection (n = 96) received a water-soluble contrast enema on day 7. The three groups of patients were similar in age, sex, diagnosis and the numbers of sutured and stapled anastomoses. The presence of a drain did not influence the postoperative morbidity or mortality rate. If the anastomosis leaked, neither faeces nor pus emerged from the drain. Ultrasonographic detection of a fluid collection was of no value: such collections bore no relationship to radiological or clinical leaks or the postoperative course. Routine use of a high-pressure suction drain after colorectal resection appears to be unnecessary.

摘要

开展了一项前瞻性随机试验,以确定使用高压封闭式腹腔引流管是否与结直肠切除术后发病率降低相关,并研究引流对术后积液的影响。连续148例行结肠或结直肠切除术的患者被随机分为不放置引流管组(n = 51)或放置高压封闭式引流管3天组(n = 47)或7天组(n = 47)。3例患者被排除。所有患者在第3天和第7天接受腹部超声检查,行左侧结直肠切除术的患者(n = 96)在第7天接受水溶性造影剂灌肠。三组患者在年龄、性别、诊断以及缝合和吻合器吻合的数量方面相似。引流管的存在并未影响术后发病率或死亡率。如果吻合口漏,引流管中既没有粪便也没有脓液流出。超声检测积液没有价值:此类积液与放射学或临床漏液或术后病程无关。结直肠切除术后常规使用高压吸引引流管似乎没有必要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验