• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[静脉磁共振血管造影用于静脉窦血栓形成的初步诊断及随访。与临床表现及数字减影血管造影的相关性]

[Venous MR angiography for the primary diagnosis and follow-up of sinus venous thrombosis. The correlation with the clinical picture and DSA].

作者信息

Vogl T J, Bergmann C U, Villringer A, Einhäupl K M, Balzer J O, Steinhoff H, Felix R

机构信息

Strahlenklinik und Poliklinik der FU Berlin, Universitätsklinikum Rudolf Virchow.

出版信息

Rofo. 1993 Jul;159(1):78-85. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1032725.

DOI:10.1055/s-2008-1032725
PMID:8334263
Abstract

30 patients clinically suspected of suffering from venous sinus thrombosis were examined by MRT with venous MR angiography (FLASH 2-D). In 8 patients selective arterial angiography was also performed and 5 patients were followed up by MR angiography after an interval of three months. The MRT images and individual MR angiography images were analysed and 3-D reconstruction performed. In 11 patients MR angiography correctly demonstrated venous sinus thrombosis; the most frequently affected were the superior sagittal sinus, the ascending cerebral veins and the transverse sinus. Compared with DSA, magnetic resonance angiography achieved a high degree of accuracy in our patients. It was significantly better in evaluating the basal sinus system whereas thrombosis of individual ascending veins was better shown by DSA. In summary, primary use of MRT and MR angiography is recommended for the diagnosis of venous sinus thrombosis.

摘要

对30例临床怀疑患有静脉窦血栓形成的患者进行了磁共振成像(MRT)检查,并采用静脉磁共振血管造影(FLASH 2-D)。8例患者还进行了选择性动脉血管造影,5例患者在间隔3个月后接受了磁共振血管造影随访。对MRT图像和个体磁共振血管造影图像进行分析并进行三维重建。11例患者的磁共振血管造影正确显示了静脉窦血栓形成;最常受累的是上矢状窦、大脑上行静脉和横窦。与数字减影血管造影(DSA)相比,磁共振血管造影在我们的患者中具有较高的准确性。在评估基底窦系统方面明显更好,而DSA在显示个体上行静脉血栓形成方面更好。总之,建议将MRT和磁共振血管造影作为诊断静脉窦血栓形成的主要方法。

相似文献

1
[Venous MR angiography for the primary diagnosis and follow-up of sinus venous thrombosis. The correlation with the clinical picture and DSA].[静脉磁共振血管造影用于静脉窦血栓形成的初步诊断及随访。与临床表现及数字减影血管造影的相关性]
Rofo. 1993 Jul;159(1):78-85. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1032725.
2
Dural sinus thrombosis: value of venous MR angiography for diagnosis and follow-up.硬脑膜窦血栓形成:静脉磁共振血管造影在诊断和随访中的价值。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 May;162(5):1191-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.162.5.8166009.
3
Cerebral venography: comparison of CT and MR projection venography.脑静脉造影:CT与MR投影静脉造影的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 Dec;169(6):1699-707. doi: 10.2214/ajr.169.6.9393193.
4
Evaluation of the intracranial dural sinuses with a 3D contrast-enhanced MP-RAGE sequence: prospective comparison with 2D-TOF MR venography and digital subtraction angiography.采用三维对比增强MP-RAGE序列评估颅内硬脑膜窦:与二维TOF MR静脉血管造影和数字减影血管造影的前瞻性比较。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 Mar;22(3):481-92.
5
Variations in the cerebral venous anatomy and pitfalls in the diagnosis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis: low field MR experience.脑静脉解剖变异及脑静脉窦血栓形成诊断中的陷阱:低场磁共振成像经验
Indian J Med Sci. 2006 Apr;60(4):135-42.
6
[A case of deep cerebral venous thrombosis with sudden convulsion after delivery].[产后突发抽搐的深部脑静脉血栓形成一例]
No To Shinkei. 2003 Jul;55(7):629-32.
7
Interobserver agreement in the magnetic resonance location of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis.脑静脉和硬脑膜窦血栓形成磁共振定位的观察者间一致性
Eur J Neurol. 2007 Mar;14(3):353-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01608.x.
8
[CT angiography of the cerebral veins].[脑静脉CT血管造影术]
Rofo. 1996 Sep;165(3):232-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015748.
9
[Clinical characteristics and outcomes of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis during pregnancy and puerperium].[妊娠期及产褥期脑静脉窦血栓形成的临床特征及结局]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2010 May;45(5):358-62.
10
Clinics in diagnostic imaging (103). Dural sinus thrombosis with cerebral venous infarction.诊断影像学临床(103)。硬脑膜窦血栓形成伴脑静脉梗死。
Singapore Med J. 2005 May;46(5):238-43; quiz 244.