Castiello U, Bennett K M, Stelmach G E
Dipartimento di Psicolgia, Universitá di Bologna, Italy.
Exp Brain Res. 1993;94(1):163-78. doi: 10.1007/BF00230479.
This study assessed the reach to grasp movement and its adaptive response to a perturbation of object size. In blocked trials, subjects (n = 12) were instructed to reach 35 cm to grasp and lift a small- (0.7 cm) or large-diameter (8 cm) cylinder. Under an unconstrained condition (condition 1), no instructions as to the type of grasp to adopt were given. Subjects thus naturally used a precision grip (PG) for the small cylinder and whole hand prehension (WHP) for the large cylinder. Under condition 2, subjects were instructed to utilize a PG for grasps of both the large and small cylinders. For condition 3, the instruction was to use WHP irrespective of object size. Kinematic organization was determined with analysis of the recordings of active markers placed on the wrist, thumb, and three fingers. For condition 1 the results showed a temporal arrangement of both components (transport and manipulation) which differed from that of conditions 2 and 3. In perturbed trials, illumination shifted from the small to large cylinder or vice versa. With condition 1, subjects automatically switched from one grasp to another with no or little increase of movement duration. This was generally achieved by an earlier temporal setting of peak wrist deceleration. For conditions 2 and 3, where a change of aperture was required, movement duration was prolonged without adaptation of earlier transport component parameters. It is concluded that the adaptive responses to a change of distal patterning also affect the organization of the proximal component. Assessment of grasps constrained by instructions may lead to interpretations of central control of the reach to grasp movement which differ from those obtained by assessing more natural prehensile patterns.
本研究评估了抓握动作的伸手触及过程及其对物体大小扰动的适应性反应。在分组试验中,受试者(n = 12)被要求伸手35厘米去抓握并提起一个小直径(0.7厘米)或大直径(8厘米)的圆柱体。在无限制条件下(条件1),未给出关于采用何种抓握方式的指示。因此,受试者自然地对小圆柱体使用精确抓握(PG),对大圆柱体使用全手抓握(WHP)。在条件2下,受试者被指示对大、小圆柱体的抓握均采用PG。对于条件3,指示是无论物体大小都使用WHP。通过分析放置在手腕、拇指和三根手指上的活动标记的记录来确定运动学组织。对于条件1,结果显示两个组成部分(运输和操作)的时间安排与条件2和3不同。在受扰动的试验中,照明从小圆柱体切换到大圆柱体,反之亦然。在条件1下,受试者自动从一种抓握方式切换到另一种抓握方式,且运动持续时间没有增加或增加很少。这通常是通过更早地设置手腕减速峰值来实现的。对于条件2和3,由于需要改变抓握孔径,运动持续时间延长,而早期运输组成部分的参数没有适应性变化。得出的结论是,对远端模式变化的适应性反应也会影响近端组成部分的组织。对受指示约束的抓握进行评估可能会导致对伸手抓握动作的中枢控制的解释与通过评估更自然的抓握模式所获得的解释不同。