Brooks R, Torchiana D, Vlahakes G J, Ruskin J N, McGovern B A, Garan H
Harvard Medical School, Cardiac Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Aug;22(2):569-74. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90066-a.
. The purpose of this study was to conduct a retrospective analysis of 16 patients with high initial defibrillation thresholds in whom a three-electrode system was used to lower defibrillation thresholds and permit implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator system.
Patients with high defibrillation thresholds (> 25 J) are uncommon but may be problematic to physicians implanting cardioverter-defibrillator systems. Most conventional systems use two defibrillating electrodes, most commonly two epicardial patches. When defibrillation thresholds remain elevated despite extensive testing of a two-electrode system, a third electrode can be incorporated and tested. However, few published data exist on the use of a three-electrode system in patients with high defibrillation thresholds.
After failure to achieve satisfactory defibrillation thresholds < 25 J with a two-patch electrode system, a third electrode was incorporated and tested. In all cases, two electrodes were joined to form a common cathode or anode, while a single electrode was used as the opposite polarity electrode. Various three-electrode configurations were then tested.
In all 16 patients, satisfactory defibrillation thresholds were achieved and a cardioverter-defibrillator was implanted (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0% to 21%). The mean final defibrillation threshold using the revised three-electrode system was 19.5 +/- 3.7 J (p < 0.0001). A mean of 6 +/- 3 electrode configurations/patient were tested before the final configuration was selected. A total of nine different electrode configurations were used in the 16 study patients; the most common of these incorporated left and right ventricular patches as combined cathode and a superior vena cava coil (n = 5) or right atrial patch electrode (n = 3) as single anode.
Patients with high initial defibrillation thresholds can generally undergo successful cardioverter-defibrillator implantation with a three-electrode system if enough electrode configurations are tested after a third electrode is incorporated.
本研究旨在对16例初始除颤阈值较高的患者进行回顾性分析,这些患者使用三电极系统来降低除颤阈值并允许植入心脏复律除颤器系统。
除颤阈值较高(>25 J)的患者并不常见,但对于植入心脏复律除颤器系统的医生来说可能会有问题。大多数传统系统使用两个除颤电极,最常见的是两个心外膜贴片。当尽管对双电极系统进行了广泛测试但除颤阈值仍保持升高时,可以加入并测试第三个电极。然而,关于在除颤阈值较高的患者中使用三电极系统的已发表数据很少。
在使用双贴片电极系统未能达到<25 J的满意除颤阈值后,加入并测试第三个电极。在所有情况下,两个电极连接形成一个公共阴极或阳极,而单个电极用作相反极性的电极。然后测试各种三电极配置。
在所有16例患者中,均实现了满意的除颤阈值并植入了心脏复律除颤器(95%置信区间[CI]=0%至21%)。使用改良三电极系统的平均最终除颤阈值为19.5±3.7 J(p<0.0001)。在选择最终配置之前,每位患者平均测试6±3种电极配置。16例研究患者共使用了9种不同的电极配置;其中最常见的是将左心室和右心室贴片作为联合阴极,将上腔静脉线圈(n=5)或右心房贴片电极(n=3)作为单个阳极。
初始除颤阈值较高的患者如果在加入第三个电极后测试足够多的电极配置,通常可以使用三电极系统成功植入心脏复律除颤器。